TEAMLEARNING-L Archives

Team-Based Learning

TEAMLEARNING-L@LISTS.UBC.CA

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show HTML Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
David Raeker-Jordan <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
David Raeker-Jordan <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sun, 16 Mar 2014 12:57:00 -0400
Content-Type:
multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (1188 bytes) , text/html (2121 bytes)
If the members of the team have not only figured out how to beat your
system but also can count on each other to abide by their agreement to make
sure that everyone gets the same score, I think you have been successful in
creating cohesive teams. I consider it a success when my teams are working
so well that they outsmarted my system.

-----------------
David Raeker-Jordan
Legal Methods Professor
Widener University School of Law
Harrisburg, PA
717.541.1996



On Sun, Mar 16, 2014 at 12:00 PM, Bradetich, Judith <
[log in to unmask]> wrote:

>  I administered peer evaluations mid-term, and reminded them they were
> not to give everyone on their team the exact same number of points, because
> not everyone does equal work, yada-yada-yada. However, I have had several
> teams try to "outsmart" the system by agreeing among themselves who will
> get a 9 or 11 from which team member, in essence making it so that everyone
> ultimately ends up with 40/40 points. I did have them do them in class, as
> I hadn't had time to put them on-line. Not sure if it would have made a
> difference.  Suggestions??
> Judi
>
>  Judi Bradetich, M.S., M.M.
> Lecturer, Development and Family Studies
> Dept. of Educational Psychology
> University of North Texas
>


ATOM RSS1 RSS2