If the members of the team have not only figured out how to beat your system but also can count on each other to abide by their agreement to make sure that everyone gets the same score, I think you have been successful in creating cohesive teams. I consider it a success when my teams are working so well that they outsmarted my system.

-----------------
David Raeker-Jordan
Legal Methods Professor
Widener University School of Law
Harrisburg, PA 
717.541.1996



On Sun, Mar 16, 2014 at 12:00 PM, Bradetich, Judith <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
I administered peer evaluations mid-term, and reminded them they were not to give everyone on their team the exact same number of points, because not everyone does equal work, yada-yada-yada. However, I have had several teams try to "outsmart" the system by agreeing among themselves who will get a 9 or 11 from which team member, in essence making it so that everyone ultimately ends up with 40/40 points. I did have them do them in class, as I hadn't had time to put them on-line. Not sure if it would have made a difference.  Suggestions??
Judi

Judi Bradetich, M.S., M.M.
Lecturer, Development and Family Studies
Dept. of Educational Psychology
University of North Texas