 
| Subject: | |
| From: | |
| Reply To: | |
| Date: | Tue, 1 Apr 2014 23:19:18 +0000 |
| Content-Type: | multipart/alternative |
| Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Hi Jim,
Thanks for the quick response. I didn't provide enough detail- there was ambiguity in the question, and I granted an appeal from another team as they outlined where the ambiguity was and how it could be changed. However this team didn't detail this but simply referred to the Scantron results. I was interested as this is my 5th year of using TBL and it's the first time a team has tried this argument.
Susan
Susan Hazel BVSc BSc(Vet) PhD GradCert (Public Health) MANZCVSc
Senior Lecturer in Animal Behaviour, Welfare and Ethics
School of Animal & Veterinary Sciences
THE UNIVERSITY OF ADELAIDE
Roseworthy SA 5371 Australia
Ph : +61 8 8313 7828
Fax : +61 8 8313 7972
e-mail: [log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>
CRICOS Provider Number 00123M
-----------------------------------------------------------
IMPORTANT: This message may contain confidential or legally privileged information. If you think it was sent to you by mistake, please delete all copies and advise the sender. For the purposes of the SPAM Act 2003, this email is authorised by The University of Adelaide.
Think green: read on the screen.
From: Sibley, James Edward [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
Sent: Wednesday, 2 April 2014 9:43 AM
To: Susan Hazel
Cc: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Appeal using Scantron stats
Ps
If students declare question ambiguity....they need to provide reworded question that clears up ambiguity..according to our appeal form
No reworded question...no appeal
Jim Sibley
Sorry for brief message -sent from my iPad
On 2014-04-01, at 3:59 PM, "Susan Hazel" <[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>> wrote:
Hi All,
Yesterday I ran a TBL and for the first time one of my teams when writing the appeal justified it by saying that only 25% of students got that question right, so it must have been ambiguous. I use the Scantron in class so that students can see for each question how they went, and this team has used the information accordingly. I won't grant this appeal as I think they have to justify why a question was ambiguous, or why the answer was wrong, but wondered if others have had similar experience and how they handled it?
Susan
Susan Hazel BVSc BSc(Vet) PhD GradCert (Public Health) MANZCVSc
Senior Lecturer in Animal Behaviour, Welfare and Ethics
School of Animal & Veterinary Sciences
THE UNIVERSITY OF ADELAIDE
Roseworthy SA 5371 Australia
Ph : +61 8 8313 7828
Fax : +61 8 8313 7972
e-mail: [log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>
CRICOS Provider Number 00123M
-----------------------------------------------------------
IMPORTANT: This message may contain confidential or legally privileged information. If you think it was sent to you by mistake, please delete all copies and advise the sender. For the purposes of the SPAM Act 2003, this email is authorised by The University of Adelaide.
Think green: read on the screen.
|
|
|
