TEAMLEARNING-L Archives

Team-Based Learning

TEAMLEARNING-L@LISTS.UBC.CA

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show HTML Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Jim Sibley <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Jim Sibley <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 17 Sep 2009 08:15:51 -0700
Content-Type:
multipart/related
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (4 kB) , text/html (7 kB) , image.gif (7 kB) , image.gif (7 kB) , image.gif (7 kB) , image.gif (7 kB) , image.gif (7 kB) , image.gif (7 kB) , image.gif (7 kB) , image.gif (7 kB) , image.gif (7 kB)
Most of my students donąt have clickers (some first years students do)

And we didnąt find the PRS software was stable enough for general classroom
use

My institution stopped using PRS in 20007....we now use iClickers.......

Clickers would certainly be  a option....but for multiple classes of 160 I
need one $800 dollars scanner.....not the 160 x $40 per clicker x multiple
classes (even though the students buy the clickers....we are talking big
dollars)

If your students have clickers already....it makes sense to use them

Jim


On 09-09-17 8:08 AM, "Gary D Lynne" <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> Jim and others, re: paper scanners:
> 
> Am curious as to why scanners are being used rather than clickers?  Pros and
> cons?   We, for the first time last spring, used the  "homework" feature (i.e.
> students enter their RAT answers during class as an in-class homework) of the
> PRS Response clicker system, and it  works great, in a class of 50-students.
> Instant grading by the computer, and a gradebook produced automatically in
> Excel format.   Also, no Departmental/teaching budget cost:  Students already
> have the clickers, because they are being used on campus in the larger general
> ed courses (like chemistry).
> 
> Gary D. Lynne, Professor
> Department of Agricultural Economics and
>  School of Natural Resources
> 103B Filley
> University of Nebraska-Lincoln
> Lincoln, NE 68583-0922
> USA
> Website:  http://www.agecon.unl.edu/facultystaff/directory/lynne.html
> Phone: 1-402-472-8281 Cell: 1-402-430-3100
> This message and any attachments are confidential, may contain privileged
> information, and are intended solely for the recipient(s) named above.  If you
> are not the intended recipient, or a person responsible for delivery to the
> named recipient, any review, distribution, dissemination or copying by you is
> prohibited. If you have received this message in error, you should notify the
> sender by return e-mail and delete the message from your computer system and
> destroy any copies in any form.
> 
> "We are always only one failed generational transfer of knowledge away from
> darkest ignorance" (Herman Daly)
> "We do not just have our own interests. We share interests with others.
> Empathy is neither altruistic nor self-interested. It rather exemplifies the
> implicit solidarity of human nature" (Robert Solomon)
> 
> Jim Sibley ---09/17/2009 09:56:33 AM---The Apperson scanner are inexpensive
> and work great.....we can easily scan
> 
>>>>> Jim Sibley <[log in to unmask]>
>>>>> Sent by: Team-Based Learning <[log in to unmask]> 09/17/2009
>>>>> 09:56 AM Please respond to
>>>>> Jim Sibley <[log in to unmask]>
>> To 
>> [log in to unmask]
>> cc 
>> Subject 
>> Re: Inexpensive Scoring Machine
>> 
>> The Apperson scanner are inexpensive and work great.....we can easily scan
>> 160 tests while the students are doing the team test (probably could score
>> 500-600 in the time)
>> 
>> I like that you don't have to attach it to a computer in class....we print
>> tally and item analysis cards right after scanning and have the aggregate
>> results to inform our mini-lecture....and office rescans the forms later to
>> generate the excel
>> 
>> I just order my fifth scanner for my Faculty
>> 
>> Haven't tried their new Apperson scanner with a feeder....would be more
>> convenient...but uses different forms than the Advantage scanners I already
>> have
>> 
>> jim
>> 
>> 
>> On 09-09-16 3:53 PM, "Herb Coleman" <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>> 
>>> > I also wonder what people think of using Gradecam to grade the iRATs and
>>> > T-RAT's.
>>> > 
>>> > http://edtech247.pbworks.com/GradeCam
>>> > 
>>> > Bill Goffe wrote:
>>>> >> For those who like to score RATs in class,
>>>> >> http://appersonedu.com/scanners/grademastertestscanner.aspx looks like a
>>>> >> possibility. I don't have a connection to them; I happened to see their
>>>> >> add in Science News and they don't seem to appear in the FAQ:
>>>> >> http://teambasedlearning.apsc.ubc.ca/?page_id=72 .
>>>> >> 
>>>> >>          - Bill
>>>> >> 
>>>> >>   
> 
-- 
Jim Sibley 
Director 
Centre for Instructional Support
Faculty of Applied Science
University of British Columbia
2208-6250 Applied Science Lane
Vancouver, BC Canada
V6T 1Z4 

Phone 604.822.9241 
Fax 604.822.7006 

Email: [log in to unmask]
Web: http://cis.apsc.ubc.ca
e-Portfolio: http://ipeer.apsc.ubc.ca/wiki/index.php/Jim_Sibley_Portfolio


________________________________________________

© Copyright 2009, Jim Sibley, All rights reserved The information contained
in this e-mail message and any attachments (collectively "message") is
intended only for the personal and confidential use of the recipient (or
recipients) named above. If the reader of this message is not the intended
recipient, you are hereby notified that you have received this message in
error and that any review, use, distribution, or copying of this message is
strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please
notify the sender immediately by e-mail, and delete the message.
 





ATOM RSS1 RSS2