MAILING LISTS

Hi All
 
Bumped into a nice peer eval article
 
http://soa.asee.org/paper/conference/paper-view.cfm?id=18205
 
They use a method where instructor decides on range effect of peer eval
 
for example 20 marks for team assignment, I will allow plus or minus 5
from peer eval
 
students assign a peer evaluation score from -5 to +5
 
they then throw out top eval to get rid of friend bias and low score to
get rid of gender, ethinicity, persoanality classh effects
 
say I end up with a +3 evaluation....team assignment is 14/20....then I
get 17
 
Interesting
 
 
 

_________________________________________________

Jim Sibley
Director
Centre for Instructional Support
Faculty of Applied Science
University of British Columbia
2208-6250 Applied Science Lane
Vancouver, BC Canada
V6T 1Z4

Phone 604.822.9241
Fax 604.822.7006

Email: [log in to unmask]
Web: www.learning.apsc.ubc.ca <http://www.learning.apsc.ubc.ca/> 
e-Portfolio:
http://ipeer.apsc.ubc.ca/wiki/index.php/Jim_Sibley_Portfolio

________________________________________________

Please submit  support requests for WebCT to our help desk at
http://cis.apsc.ubc.ca/helpdesk/ <http://cis.apsc.ubc.ca/helpdesk/>  

________________________________________________

(c) Copyright 2009, Jim Sibley, All rights reserved The information
contained in this e-mail message and any attachments (collectively
"message") is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the
recipient (or recipients) named above. If the reader of this message is
not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you have
received this message in error and that any review, use, distribution,
or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received
this message in error, please notify the sender immediately by e-mail,
and delete the original message.

___________________________________________________