Hi All Bumped into a nice peer eval article http://soa.asee.org/paper/conference/paper-view.cfm?id=18205 They use a method where instructor decides on range effect of peer eval for example 20 marks for team assignment, I will allow plus or minus 5 from peer eval students assign a peer evaluation score from -5 to +5 they then throw out top eval to get rid of friend bias and low score to get rid of gender, ethinicity, persoanality classh effects say I end up with a +3 evaluation....team assignment is 14/20....then I get 17 Interesting _________________________________________________ Jim Sibley Director Centre for Instructional Support Faculty of Applied Science University of British Columbia 2208-6250 Applied Science Lane Vancouver, BC Canada V6T 1Z4 Phone 604.822.9241 Fax 604.822.7006 Email: [log in to unmask] Web: www.learning.apsc.ubc.ca <http://www.learning.apsc.ubc.ca/> e-Portfolio: http://ipeer.apsc.ubc.ca/wiki/index.php/Jim_Sibley_Portfolio ________________________________________________ Please submit support requests for WebCT to our help desk at http://cis.apsc.ubc.ca/helpdesk/ <http://cis.apsc.ubc.ca/helpdesk/> ________________________________________________ (c) Copyright 2009, Jim Sibley, All rights reserved The information contained in this e-mail message and any attachments (collectively "message") is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the recipient (or recipients) named above. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you have received this message in error and that any review, use, distribution, or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately by e-mail, and delete the original message. ___________________________________________________