TEAMLEARNING-L Archives

Team-Based Learning

TEAMLEARNING-L@LISTS.UBC.CA

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show HTML Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Martikean, Carl" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Martikean, Carl
Date:
Sat, 21 Jan 2006 08:11:25 -0600
Content-Type:
multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (959 bytes) , text/html (1724 bytes)
I am a high school physics-Chemistry teacher at a mathematics and science academy in Forest Park, Illinois.  I am converting my classes to the TBL model and have come across a concern about the Epstein Education IF-AT answer sheets.
 
Specifically, how would the group RAT work if the form also has been used for the individual RAT?  I love the idea of the immediate feedback and the fact that the student gets several opportunities for reassess his logic.  However, if the students keep track of their individual answers and us them as a reminder for the group RAT, then each group will (would) always get perfect scores simply by comparing and selecting the correct answer.  So, I guess that the question is how to get a discussion going as to why the incorrect choices were made in the first place.  This is not a problem with the scantron forms but then the immediate feedback is also delayed.
 
Any ideas would be greatly appreciated.
 
Carl E. Martikean
PMSA Science


ATOM RSS1 RSS2