TEAMLEARNING-L Archives

Team-Based Learning

TEAMLEARNING-L@LISTS.UBC.CA

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Content-transfer-encoding:
7bit
Sender:
Team-Based Learning <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Gundula Bosch <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 21 Jan 2013 19:53:47 -0800
MIME-version:
1.0
Content-type:
multipart/mixed; boundary=part-hz1F2zYqCn8OC1OJCaz-xvE9UD-l2qf31wIO9Z2-279x-
Reply-To:
Gundula Bosch <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
Hi Sharona, 

I'm also in the process of digging into this topic, and came across a paper by 
Ohland et al. (2005) about peer evaluation of team skills which I found 
particularly helpful (likewise, the quoted references 8 and 10). Please find it 
attached. The authors evaluate several peer evaluation forms in terms of 
internal consistency. My personal concern with the forms would be that the 
evaluator is supposed to reveal his/her identity, which is something I will not 
do when I develop an instrument for my students. Still I found these example 
forms helpful to get an idea of what obviously worked already for other 
disciplines. 

The Mennenga-paper that Jim posted earlier is also great - I had not seen it 
before. In general, I noticed that the engineering as well as the medical / 
nursing disciplines are quite advanced in this field, especially with respect to 
validity evidence. So it might be worth looking into publications similar to the 
Mennenga paper. 

Hope this helps, 
best
Gundula 


Gundula Bosch, Ph.D.
Johns Hopkins University
Bloomberg School of Public Health
Molecular Microbiology & Immunology
615 North Wolfe Street
Baltimore, MD 21205

phone: (410) 340-8361
fax:      (410) 955-0105



ATOM RSS1 RSS2