MAILING LISTS

JeeHae

I was just about to send out the same email.  I hope you'll consider sharing your findings

Manda

Sent from my iPhone

> On Apr 6, 2016, at 5:44 PM, JeeHae Nam <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> 
> Hello everyone,
> 
> I have a question about course evaluations. This was my first year trying to implement TBL into my course. However, given the different nature of the class and poor structure, I feel that the traditional course evaluation questions are not as applicable. I am pasting below the usual questions that are asked of students university-wide at Boston College. I am thinking that I would want to include more process-oriented questions, but I wanted to ask the group on thoughts and recommendations. 
> 
> Any thoughts or examples would be appreciated!
> 
> PART A
> Note to students: Responses to Part A are anonymously reported to the faculty member, the department chair, the deans, and made available in summary form to other students.
> Instructor
> 1.	Which of the following statements apply to this instructor?
>  	a.	The instructor was prepared.
>  	 	 	
> Strongly Agree
> 
> Agree
> 
> Uncertain
> 
> Disagree
> 
> Strongly Disagree
> 
>  	b.	The instructor was available for help outside of class.
>  	 	 	
> Strongly Agree
> 
> Agree
> 
> Uncertain
> 
> Disagree
> 
> Strongly Disagree
> 
>  	c.	The instructor returned assignments/tests conscientiously.
>  	 	 	
> Strongly Agree
> 
> Agree
> 
> Uncertain
> 
> Disagree
> 
> Strongly Disagree
> 
>  	d.	The instructor showed enthusiasm about the subject matter.
>  	 	 	
> Strongly Agree
> 
> Agree
> 
> Uncertain
> 
> Disagree
> 
> Strongly Disagree
> 
>  	e.	The instructor stimulated interest in the subject matter.
>  	 	 	
> Strongly Agree
> 
> Agree
> 
> Uncertain
> 
> Disagree
> 
> Strongly Disagree
> 
>  	f.	The instructor’s explanations were clear.
>  	 	 	
> Strongly Agree
> 
> Agree
> 
> Uncertain
> 
> Disagree
> 
> Strongly Disagree
> 
>  	g.	The instructor treated students with respect.
>  	 	 	
> Strongly Agree
> 
> Agree
> 
> Uncertain
> 
> Disagree
> 
> Strongly Disagree
> 
> 2.	How would you rate this instructor overall as a teacher?
>  	 	 	
> Excellent
> 
> Very Good
> 
> Good
> 
> Fair
> 
> Poor
> 
> Course
> 3.	Which of the following statements apply to this course?
>  	a.	The course was well organized.
>  	 	 	
> Strongly Agree
> 
> Agree
> 
> Uncertain
> 
> Disagree
> 
> Strongly Disagree
> 
>  	b.	The course generally followed the syllabus.
>  	 	 	
> Strongly Agree
> 
> Agree
> 
> Uncertain
> 
> Disagree
> 
> Strongly Disagree
> 
>  	c.	Class attendance was necessary for learning the course material.
>  	 	 	
> Strongly Agree
> 
> Agree
> 
> Uncertain
> 
> Disagree
> 
> Strongly Disagree
> 
>  	d.	The course was intellectually challenging.
>  	 	 	
> Strongly Agree
> 
> Agree
> 
> Uncertain
> 
> Disagree
> 
> Strongly Disagree
> 
>  	e.	Compared to similar courses (i.e. core, major, etc.), this course required:
>  	 	 	
> Much More Effort
> 
> More Effort
> 
> About the Same Effort
> 
> Less Effort
> 
> Much Less Effort
> 
> 4.	How would you rate this course overall?
>  	 	 	
> Excellent
> 
> Very Good
> 
> Good
> 
> Fair
> 
> Poor
> 
> PART B
> Note to students: Responses to the open-ended questions are anonymously reported to the instructor, the department chair, and the deans.
> 1. What are the strengths of this course? 2. How could the instructor improve the course? 3. Would you recommend this course to other students, majors etc.? Why or why not? 4. Additional comments:
> 
> To unsubscribe from the TEAMLEARNING-L list, please click here.
> 
> Further information about the UBC Mailing Lists service can be found on the UBC IT website.

########################################################################

To unsubscribe from the TEAMLEARNING-L list, please click the following link:
https://lists.ubc.ca/scripts/wa.exe?SUBED1=TEAMLEARNING-L&A=1

Further information about the UBC Mailing Lists service can be found on the UBC IT website.