TEAMLEARNING-L Archives

Team-Based Learning

TEAMLEARNING-L@LISTS.UBC.CA

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show HTML Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Amanda Rees <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Amanda Rees <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 30 Apr 2019 17:18:35 +0100
Content-Type:
multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (2966 bytes) , text/html (5 kB)
Dear Marina,

Some TBL folks do not grade applications at all as the process of sharing
answers simultaneously opens up yet another opportunity for learning as
teams discuss their responses amongst teams.

In my first year undergraduate social science (geography) class I’m working
to support student's skills to identify, use and cite their evidence, so Im
not grading "right" answers but grading their capacity to create an in-text
citation and a reference. They have midterm and final individual writing
assignments that need to demonstrate evidence and identifying the source
effectively so getting that feedback 7-8 times in a semester works well in
developing that skill.

I love Phil's idea about giving folks the full grade and then deducting -
he's getting at the much broader issues of engagement and understanding.
Very inspiring.

Manda



On Mon, Apr 29, 2019 at 11:13 AM Marina Di Carro <[log in to unmask]>
wrote:

> Hello everybody,
>
> I'd like to ask you some tips on correcting and grading application
> exercises.
> Do you use a sort of rubric for each assignment? That is to say, you
> decide to give full marks for the right explanation and the right letter,
> about 80% of the maximum if they understand the reason behind but choose
> the wrong letter... and so on?
> I am about to correct more or less 11 application activities for each
> teams (there are 10 teams...) for a total of more than 100 exercises... I
> need something fair, so that teams who have reasoned well can be rewarded,
> but also simple, because I'd rather not spend hours and hours on them. In
> our grading system top mark is 30/30 and pass mark 18/30, so there are many
> possibilities to discriminate between two different grades.
>
> Any suggestion you can give me will be helpful.
>
> Thank you very much--
> Marina
>
> **********************************************************
> Marina Di Carro, PhD
> Department of Chemistry and Industrial Chemistry
> University of Genoa
>
> Via Dodecaneso, 31
> <https://maps.google.com/?q=Via+Dodecaneso,+31+%0D%0A++++++++++16146%C2%A0+Genova+-+Italy&entry=gmail&source=g>
> 16146  Genova - Italy
> <https://maps.google.com/?q=Via+Dodecaneso,+31+%0D%0A++++++++++16146%C2%A0+Genova+-+Italy&entry=gmail&source=g>
>
> tel   +39 010 3536198
>
>        +39 010 3536173
> fax  +39 010 3536190
>
> email address: [log in to unmask]
> **********************************************************
>
> ------------------------------
>
> To unsubscribe from the TEAMLEARNING-L list, please click here.
> <https://lists.ubc.ca/scripts/wa.exe?SUBED1=TEAMLEARNING-L&A=1>
>
> Further information about the UBC Mailing Lists service can be found on
> the UBC IT website.
>

########################################################################

To unsubscribe from the TEAMLEARNING-L list, please click the following link:
https://lists.ubc.ca/scripts/wa.exe?SUBED1=TEAMLEARNING-L&A=1

Further information about the UBC Mailing Lists service can be found on the UBC IT website.


ATOM RSS1 RSS2