MAILING LISTS

I just found a report on article reference on the web and, although I
haven't seen the article itself, I think it probably speaks to the issue
of peer evaluations in a very powerful way.  The url is:

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/12188869/?GT1=7938

Larry


>>>Sibley, Jim <[log in to unmask]> 02/23/06 9:48 am >>>
Hi


One way around this....maybe...is to  base any grade differential or
peer eval mark on difference from the average individual score...so if
the group gives everyone 100...they are just average..

jim

From: Team Learning Discussion List [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
On Behalf Of Hadley, Mary
Sent: Thursday, February 23, 2006 7:28 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Question


Peer Evaluations
My teams are doing peer evaluations.  I am sure they have gotten
together and planned how to make sure every student gets the same max
evaluation.
For example, please see the two table below. I will not include all 5
evaluations all you have to do is repeat the table 5 times and each
person gets 4 evaluations of 100 and one of 85.
This has happened with 14 groups and almost every student.  Maybe, this
is fine but it seems to me I should have just started everyone in the
class with 97 peer evaluation points.
Any suggestion or does this just happen?
No one except me sees the evaluations.

Al
evaluator
Mary
100
Jim<o p="#DEFA