Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Tue, 26 Apr 2011 09:28:05 -0400 |
Content-Type: | multipart/alternative |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Please attach article or give reference. D
Sent from my iPad
On Apr 26, 2011, at 9:20 AM, "Sweet, Michael S" <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> Nice! :-)
>
>
>
> -M
>
>
>
>
>
> From: Sarah Meerts [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
> Sent: Tuesday, April 26, 2011 8:19 AM
> To: Sweet, Michael S
> Cc: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: Question
>
>
>
> Here's an article that shows that the collective intelligence of the group is positively correlated with the number of females in the group, largely because females are more socially sensitive (according to a social sensitivity measure). Apparently, a group with more equally distributed conversational turn-taking has a higher collective intelligence than a group in which a few members dominate the interactions.
>
>
>
> Sarah Meerts
|
|
|