 
| Subject: | |
| From: | |
| Reply To: | |
| Date: | Sun, 16 Mar 2014 12:56:15 -0400 |
| Content-Type: | multipart/alternative |
| Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
If teams feel that strongly and are that cooperative to figure out equal scoring for all, then I allow it. I never suggest it as a possibility though. If there are team members that are not contributing fairly, I find that students are quick to single out those teammates.
Nicole Arduini-Van Hoose
Hudson Valley Community College
On Mar 16, 2014, at 12:28 PM, "Bradetich, Judith" <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> I administered peer evaluations mid-term, and reminded them they were not to give everyone on their team the exact same number of points, because not everyone does equal work, yada-yada-yada. However, I have had several teams try to "outsmart" the system by agreeing among themselves who will get a 9 or 11 from which team member, in essence making it so that everyone ultimately ends up with 40/40 points. I did have them do them in class, as I hadn't had time to put them on-line. Not sure if it would have made a difference. Suggestions??
> Judi
>
> Judi Bradetich, M.S., M.M.
> Lecturer, Development and Family Studies
> Dept. of Educational Psychology
> University of North Texas
|
|
|
