There has been a quality control problem with the coatings
Bad forms can be returned and will be replaced for free
We always scratch one form to check both keying and scratch-off ability
Some instructors have taken to having their TA's carefully scratch with
a fine pin the coatings...they line up a straight edge at extreme margin
of blocks and carefully scratch
The newer forms in the A series (25 questions - 4 distracters) seem to
be free of any problems
Jim
________________________________
From: Team Learning Discussion List [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
On Behalf Of Fritz Laux
Sent: Friday, April 11, 2008 10:15 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: IF-AT use
I've had many problems with the IF-AT forms. What happens is that
goldish film covering the answers simply won't scratch off (it seems
especially stubborn over where the stars are). Students end up with
holes in the forms, etc.
Perhaps some of you know a secret on this? Is it perhaps too much
humidity? Suggestions? I have been too timid to complain to Epstein but
plan, one day, to be more courageous.
Fritz Laux
Economics
Northeastern State U
________________________________
From: Team Learning Discussion List [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
On Behalf Of John Fritz
Sent: Friday, April 11, 2008 9:04 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: IF-AT use
We're starting to use clickers instead of scantrons as well.
As far as I can tell, the only way NOT to kill trees and NOT use
scantrons is to have students bring their own laptop to class and
complete the quiz, perhaps in a course management system. This way they
see the questions AND answer choices. But as long as you don't allow
them to see the CORRECT answers for the online individual quiz, they can
use one member's laptop to see the questions and then complete the IF-AT
answer sheet "team quiz."
There was a thread a few months ago on this list about how to even use
an online quiz for the team quiz, but I have to say there really is no
substitute for the energy of people working with the scratch off cards
hoping to hit jackpot on their first answer choice. Great stuff.
The only reason I'd like to see the online team quiz option is so an
online-only class might be able to experience what a Face-to-Face or
hybrid/blended class does with the team scratch off cards. While the
video conferencing tools are getting better, the only problem for an
online class is security: how do you guarantee that online students
aren't skipping to the "open book" (appeals stage) that is supposed to
come AFTER the team quiz.
Later,
John
On Apr 11, 2008, at 9:49 AM, Sandy Cook wrote:
We have been using audience response system that permits the students to
take the individual tests at their own pace. It require killing trees
for the exams, but the beauty is that we don't have to have them go
question by question - they can go back and forth as desired, AND, we
have real-time data on how they perform on each item and quick scoring.
I wouldn't want to do it any other way.
Sandy
**************************************************
Sandy Cook, PhD
Associate Dean for Curriculum Development
Duke/NUS Graduate School of Medicine
-----Original Message-----
From: Team Learning Discussion List on behalf of Gary D Lynne
Sent: Fri 4/11/2008 8:36 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Fw: IF-AT use
Scott, I am wondering what scanner technology you have been using?
This
is one of the challenges with using this approach, on finding out,
during
class which questions/concepts are creating problems for the students.
Being able to scan a score sheet, immediately, sounds like the way to go
(doing it while the Teams are working through the one- IF AT each team
fills out).
We have experimented with sampling... in a class of 48-students this
semester, randomly pulling out a 25% sample of the score sheets (which
we
had made-up, using the "allocation of 4-points" for the case of
4-possible
answers, approach) they turn in before they go into the Team/IF AT
part
of the exercise. Then, we hand grade those 12-score sheets, using clear
plastic overlays... having TA help here.. and then "lecture" only on
what
the sample of 12 suggests are problem areas. This works to the extent
the
sample is representative... but I would prefer having a scanner in class
to
see how all 48-students handled the questions. Also, grading 48-score
sheets by plastic overlay/by hand is tedious at best! (Also, I am
assuming
the scanner technology you are using also associates the name with the
score? Data (grades/score) management for upwards of 10 or more RATs X
48
students, plus 10 X 8 Team RATs a semester is a nightmare!
Thank you for any help you can provide in this matter.
Gary D. Lynne, Professor
Department of Agricultural Economics and
School of Natural Resources
103B Filley
University of Nebraska-Lincoln
Lincoln, NE 68583-0922
Website: http://agecon.unl.edu/lynne
Phone: 1-402-472-8281
"We are always only one failed generational transfer of knowledge away
from
darkest ignorance" (Herman Daly)
----- Forwarded by Gary D Lynne/AgEcon/IANR/UNEBR on 04/11/2008 07:24 AM
-----
Scott Zimmerman
<scottzimmerman@M
ISSOURISTATE.EDU>
To
Sent by: Team [log in to unmask]
Learning
cc
Discussion List
<TEAMLEARNING-L@L
Subject
ISTS.OU.EDU> Re: IF-AT use
04/11/2008 06:58
AM
Please respond to
Scott Zimmerman
<scottzimmerman@M
ISSOURISTATE.EDU>
Christine,
The two RATs are exactly the same. Ideally, we use a scantron for the
individual and the IF-AT for the team. The scantron allows us to
correct
the individual RAT during the team RAT. Since our scanner is no longer
functioning, we have been correcting the IRATs by hand.
Scott
On 4/10/08 11:42 PM, "Christine Kuramoto"
<[log in to unmask]>
wrote:
> Hi again,
> It looks to me as if the tests are the same, but if you use the IF-AT
> forms for the individual tests, they'll already know the answers
before
> the group test so . . . Is it best to only use the IF-AT for the group
test?
> Christine
--
Scott D. Zimmerman, PhD
Biomedical Sciences Department
Missouri State University
Springfield, MO 65897
(417) 836-6123
Fax (417) 836-5588
<pic16972.gif><ecblank.gif>
|
