TEAMLEARNING-L Archives

Team-Based Learning

TEAMLEARNING-L@LISTS.UBC.CA

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show HTML Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Jim Sibley <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Jim Sibley <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 1 Apr 2014 16:06:15 -0700
Content-Type:
multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (1819 bytes) , text/html (4 kB)
25% correct...translates to a p value of .25....which does indicate a difficult question....but a possibly reasonable

P values typically should range from .75 to .25

When you see a low p value (hard question)...you should look at the discrimination index to ensure that the question is working right (i.e. positive discriminating between students who did well on test (prepared well) and students that didn't)

If the question is hard and discriminating well..its fine

Jim

Jim Sibley

Sorry for brief message -sent from my iPad

On 2014-04-01, at 3:57 PM, Susan Hazel <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> Hi All,
> Yesterday I ran a TBL and for the first time one of my teams when writing the appeal justified it by saying that only 25% of students got that question right, so it must have been ambiguous. I use the Scantron in class so that students can see for each question how they went, and this team has used the information accordingly. I won’t grant this appeal as I think they have to justify why a question was ambiguous, or why the answer was wrong, but wondered if others have had similar experience and how they handled it?
> Susan
>  
> Susan Hazel BVSc BSc(Vet) PhD GradCert (Public Health) MANZCVSc
> Senior Lecturer in Animal Behaviour, Welfare and Ethics
> School of Animal & Veterinary Sciences
> THE UNIVERSITY OF ADELAIDE
> Roseworthy SA 5371 Australia
> Ph    : +61 8 8313 7828
> Fax   : +61 8 8313 7972
> e-mail: [log in to unmask]
> CRICOS Provider Number 00123M
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> IMPORTANT: This message may contain confidential or legally privileged information. If you think it was sent to you by mistake, please delete all copies and advise the sender. For the purposes of the SPAM Act 2003, this email is authorised by The University of Adelaide.
> Think green: read on the screen.
>  


ATOM RSS1 RSS2