TEAMLEARNING-L Archives

Team-Based Learning

TEAMLEARNING-L@LISTS.UBC.CA

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show HTML Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Sibley, James Edward" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Sibley, James Edward
Date:
Tue, 9 Oct 2012 19:34:58 +0000
Content-Type:
multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (2320 bytes) , text/html (5 kB)
Hi

I think this should probably be allowed

The team revisited the question, thought deeply enough about it to write a well written and well reasoned appeal….this is wonderful stuff

The team is rallying around a team member (cohesion)….also wonderful stuff

My only slight concern would be….if the bright student wrote the appeal by themselves…with no team input….then we don't get the above two wonderful's :-(

jim
--
Jim Sibley
Director
Centre for Instructional Support
Faculty of Applied Science
University of British Columbia
2205-6250 Applied Science Lane
Vancouver, BC Canada
V6T 1Z4

Phone 604.822.9241
Fax 604.822.7006

Email: [log in to unmask]<applewebdata:[log in to unmask]>

Check out http://<http://cis.apsc.ubc.ca/>www.teambasedlearning.org


© Copyright 2012, Jim Sibley, All rights reserved The information contained in this e-mail message and any attachments (collectively "message") is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the recipient (or recipients) named above. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you have received this message in error and that any review, use, distribution, or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this in error, please notify the sender immediately by e-mail, and delete the meesage.

From: "Anderson, Douglas C" <[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>>
Reply-To: "Anderson, Douglas C" <[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>>
Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2012 15:26:49 -0400
To: <[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>>
Subject: Appeals for i/tRATS

I didn't specify that this couldn't be done in the syllabus because, honestly, I didn't think about it.  But one of my teams appealed a question on the RAT even though the team got it right on the tRAT, because one of the members of the team got the question wrong on the iRAT.  The student who got the question wrong is one of the brighter students in the class, and their appeal was well written and well reasoned.  I'm going to allow it this time because I didn't address it in the syllabus.  But for future reference, should this be allowed?

--
Douglas C. Anderson, Jr., Pharm.D., D.Ph., C.A.C.P.
Professor and Chair
Department of Pharmacy Practice
Cedarville University School of Pharmacy

Phil 4:13


ATOM RSS1 RSS2