TEAMLEARNING-L Archives

Team-Based Learning

TEAMLEARNING-L@LISTS.UBC.CA
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show HTML Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Re: IF AT problems
From:
"Sibley, James Edward" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Sibley, James Edward
Date:
Sat, 19 Oct 2013 00:43:59 +0000
Content-Type:
multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (1194 bytes) , text/html (1865 bytes) 
Hi

A few things

Vigilance is always part of the game.....we always circulate around

Our tRATs are often only worth 1.5 to 2%....so we don't get overly worried about the ODD transgression

We also have a professionalism  sermon about if you let this kind behaviour happen in your team and you don't say anything....you are condoning it.....and thereby guilty of cheating as well

Vigilance and the sermon usually takes care of most of it

Jim

Jim Sibley

Sorry for brief message -sent from my iPad

On 2013-10-18, at 5:35 PM, "Douglas C. Anderson, Jr., Pharm.D., D.Ph., C.A.C.P." <[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>> wrote:

On 10/18/2013 8:16 PM, Nicole L Arduini-VanHoose wrote:

Are they just listening to the letter choice or the entire discussion? Perhaps give multiple versions of the test with different IFAT cards and be sure that neighboring teams have different versions of the test.



I don't know that they're listening to the entire discussion. The only thing I've been told about is the letter choice. I could key multiple versions of the quizzes. More work for me...


--
Douglas C. Anderson, Jr., Pharm.D., D.Ph., C.A.C.P.
Professor and Chair
Department of Pharmacy Practice
Cedarville University School of Pharmacy

Phil 4:13

ATOM RSS1 RSS2