Skip Navigational Links
LISTSERV email list manager
UBC Mailing Lists 17.0 - LISTS.UBC.CA

MAILING LISTS

UBC Mailing Lists Menu
Log In
Log In
UBC Mailing Lists 17.0 Help - TEAMLEARNING-L Archives
UBC Mailing Lists Archives
UBC Mailing Lists Archives
Search Archives
Search Archives
Register
Register
Log In
Log In

TEAMLEARNING-L Archives

Team-Based Learning

TEAMLEARNING-L@LISTS.UBC.CA

Menu
UBC Mailing Lists Archives UBC Mailing Lists Archives
TEAMLEARNING-L Home TEAMLEARNING-L Home

Log In Log In
Register Register

Subscribe or Unsubscribe Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Search Archives Search Archives
Options: Use Classic View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
"Contribubtion" comments in qualitative assessment
Judith Garrison <[log in to unmask]>
Wed, 25 Sep 2013 12:39:15 -0700
text/plain (21 lines)
Interesting comment from my class today raises some questions about the peer
feedback process.  As we went over the scoring for the first peer
assessment,  we were talking about how to write a constructive/useful
comment answering the question about the "single most valuable thing a team
member contributes" in the case when a team member does not contribute.  One
student pointed out that if she has a team member (Bob) who never
contributes (or rarely shows up) she would just have to "make something up"
in order to get a good score on the usefulness of her feedback. 

So my first question is, if  Bob is really slacking and not making a
contribution, do his teammates get marked down if they can't identify a
contribution Bob makes? 

This raises a second question.  If Bob (from above) is not really involved
or not attending, how do we justify using his quantitative assessment scores
to evaluate his teammates?  

Eager to hear from y'all.

Judith 

ATOM RSS1 RSS2

LISTS.UBC.CA CataList Email List Search Powered by LISTSERV