We're starting to use clickers instead of scantrons as well.
As far as I can tell, the only way NOT to kill trees and NOT use
scantrons is to have students bring their own laptop to class and
complete the quiz, perhaps in a course management system. This way
they see the questions AND answer choices. But as long as you don't
allow them to see the CORRECT answers for the online individual quiz,
they can use one member's laptop to see the questions and then
complete the IF-AT answer sheet "team quiz."
There was a thread a few months ago on this list about how to even use
an online quiz for the team quiz, but I have to say there really is no
substitute for the energy of people working with the scratch off cards
hoping to hit jackpot on their first answer choice. Great stuff.
The only reason I'd like to see the online team quiz option is so an
online-only class might be able to experience what a Face-to-Face or
hybrid/blended class does with the team scratch off cards. While the
video conferencing tools are getting better, the only problem for an
online class is security: how do you guarantee that online students
aren't skipping to the "open book" (appeals stage) that is supposed to
come AFTER the team quiz.
Later,
John
On Apr 11, 2008, at 9:49 AM, Sandy Cook wrote:
> We have been using audience response system that permits the
> students to take the individual tests at their own pace. It require
> killing trees for the exams, but the beauty is that we don't have to
> have them go question by question - they can go back and forth as
> desired, AND, we have real-time data on how they perform on each
> item and quick scoring. I wouldn't want to do it any other way.
>
> Sandy
>
> **************************************************
> Sandy Cook, PhD
> Associate Dean for Curriculum Development
> Duke/NUS Graduate School of Medicine
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Team Learning Discussion List on behalf of Gary D Lynne
> Sent: Fri 4/11/2008 8:36 PM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Fw: IF-AT use
>
>
>
> Scott, I am wondering what scanner technology you have been using?
> This
> is one of the challenges with using this approach, on finding out,
> during
> class which questions/concepts are creating problems for the students.
> Being able to scan a score sheet, immediately, sounds like the way
> to go
> (doing it while the Teams are working through the one- IF AT each team
> fills out).
>
> We have experimented with sampling... in a class of 48-students this
> semester, randomly pulling out a 25% sample of the score sheets
> (which we
> had made-up, using the "allocation of 4-points" for the case of 4-
> possible
> answers, approach) they turn in before they go into the Team/IF AT
> part
> of the exercise. Then, we hand grade those 12-score sheets, using
> clear
> plastic overlays... having TA help here.. and then "lecture" only
> on what
> the sample of 12 suggests are problem areas. This works to the
> extent the
> sample is representative... but I would prefer having a scanner in
> class to
> see how all 48-students handled the questions. Also, grading 48-score
> sheets by plastic overlay/by hand is tedious at best! (Also, I am
> assuming
> the scanner technology you are using also associates the name with the
> score? Data (grades/score) management for upwards of 10 or more
> RATs X 48
> students, plus 10 X 8 Team RATs a semester is a nightmare!
>
> Thank you for any help you can provide in this matter.
>
> Gary D. Lynne, Professor
> Department of Agricultural Economics and
> School of Natural Resources
> 103B Filley
> University of Nebraska-Lincoln
> Lincoln, NE 68583-0922
> Website: http://agecon.unl.edu/lynne
> Phone: 1-402-472-8281
>
> "We are always only one failed generational transfer of knowledge
> away from
> darkest ignorance" (Herman Daly)
> ----- Forwarded by Gary D Lynne/AgEcon/IANR/UNEBR on 04/11/2008
> 07:24 AM
> -----
>
> Scott Zimmerman
> <scottzimmerman@M
>
> ISSOURISTATE.EDU> To
> Sent by: Team [log in to unmask]
>
> Learning cc
> Discussion List
> <TEAMLEARNING-L@L
> Subject
> ISTS.OU.EDU> Re: IF-AT use
>
>
> 04/11/2008 06:58
> AM
>
>
> Please respond to
> Scott Zimmerman
> <scottzimmerman@M
> ISSOURISTATE.EDU>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Christine,
>
> The two RATs are exactly the same. Ideally, we use a scantron for the
> individual and the IF-AT for the team. The scantron allows us to
> correct
> the individual RAT during the team RAT. Since our scanner is no
> longer
> functioning, we have been correcting the IRATs by hand.
>
> Scott
>
>
> On 4/10/08 11:42 PM, "Christine Kuramoto" <[log in to unmask]
> >
> wrote:
>
> > Hi again,
> > It looks to me as if the tests are the same, but if you use the IF-
> AT
> > forms for the individual tests, they'll already know the answers
> before
> > the group test so . . . Is it best to only use the IF-AT for the
> group
> test?
> > Christine
>
> --
> Scott D. Zimmerman, PhD
> Biomedical Sciences Department
> Missouri State University
> Springfield, MO 65897
> (417) 836-6123
> Fax (417) 836-5588
>
>
> <pic16972.gif><ecblank.gif>
|
