TEAMLEARNING-L Archives

Team-Based Learning

TEAMLEARNING-L@LISTS.UBC.CA

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="Windows-1252"
Date:
Thu, 2 Oct 2014 13:05:09 +0000
Reply-To:
Andrew W Keitt <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Andrew W Keitt <[log in to unmask]>
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
8bit
In-Reply-To:
MIME-Version:
1.0
Sender:
Team-Based Learning <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (8 lines)
I know that appeals are only granted to teams, but I’m have some push back on this policy and am having trouble justifying it. Let’s say there are two answers and there is a good case to be made that they are equally plausible—the team picks the “correct” answer, but the individual student, although she has made a good argument for her choice, is out of luck. In a big class it’s not feasible to entertain each individual appeal, but apart from logistics I’m having a hard time justifying it. 

Does anyone have a suggestion for how to deal with this?

Thanks!

Andrew Keitt

ATOM RSS1 RSS2