MAILING LISTS

She did attach it.  For those who did not get an attachment, the reference is:



Williams Woolley, A. et al.. (2010). Evidence for a collective intelligence factor in the performance of human groups. Science(330). 686-688.



-M









From: Dean Parmelee [mailto:[log in to unmask]]

Sent: Tuesday, April 26, 2011 8:28 AM

To: Sweet, Michael S

Cc: [log in to unmask]

Subject: Re: Question



Please attach article or give reference.  D



Sent from my iPad



On Apr 26, 2011, at 9:20 AM, "Sweet, Michael S" <[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>> wrote:

Nice!  :-)



-M





From: Sarah Meerts [mailto:[log in to unmask]]

Sent: Tuesday, April 26, 2011 8:19 AM

To: Sweet, Michael S

Cc: [log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>

Subject: Re: Question



Here's an article that shows that the collective intelligence of the group is positively correlated with the number of females in the group, largely because females are more socially sensitive (according to a social sensitivity measure).  Apparently, a group with more equally distributed conversational turn-taking has a higher collective intelligence than a group in which a few members dominate the interactions.



Sarah Meerts