That¡¯s it exactly Jim! The ¡®right first time¡¯ has to be worth it. And the marks, once converted to %, have to feel right. I hadn¡¯t heard of the 4-3-2-1 approach before, until seeing Roy¡¯s email. I think you¡¯ve hit the essential ¡°con¡± on the head with your response!
Josie
Dr Josie A Fraser
Senior Lecturer in Pharmacology, Bradford School of Pharmacy
Associate Dean for Learning & Teaching, Faculty of Life Sciences
School of Pharmacy
Faculty of Life Sciences
University of Bradford
Bradford
West Yorkshire
BD7 1DP
T: (+44)(0)1274 234663
E: [log in to unmask]
From: <Sibley>, James Edward <[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>>
Date: Friday, 16 January 2015 15:54
To: Josie Fraser <[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>>, "[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>" <[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>>
Subject: Re: tRAT Grading
Hi
We use 4-2-1-0 on 4 distractor cards and 8-4-2-1-0 on five distractors cards
The 4-3-2-1-0¡¦makes me uncomfortable ¡¦.a student could not know a single right answer¡¦but get them on the second try and still get 75% on test¡¦.that just feels wrong to me
jim
--
Jim Sibley
Director
Centre for Instructional Support
http://cis.apsc.ubc.ca/
Faculty of Applied Science
University of British Columbia
2205-6250 Applied Science Lane
Vancouver, BC Canada
V6T 1Z4
Phone 604.822.9241
Email: [log in to unmask]<applewebdata:[log in to unmask]>
Check out this recent article<http://www.macleans.ca/education/multiple-choice-multiple-students/> in Macleans - Canada¡¯s news magazine
Check out my new book Getting Started with Team-Based Learning<http://www.learntbl.ca> available at Stylus Publishing<https://styluspub.presswarehouse.com/Books/SearchResults.aspx?str=getting+started+with+team-based+learning>
Check out my TBL website at www.learntbl.ca<http://www.learntbl.ca>
? Copyright 2015, Jim Sibley, All rights reserved The information contained in this e-mail message and any attachments (collectively "message") is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the recipient (or recipients) named above. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you have received this message in error and that any review, use, distribution, or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this in error, please notify the sender immediately by e-mail, and delete the message.
From: Josie Fraser <[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>>
Reply-To: Josie Fraser <[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>>
Date: Friday, January 16, 2015 at 7:08 AM
To: "[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>" <[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>>
Subject: Re: tRAT Grading
We use 4 - 2 - 1 - 0
We have A-D (4 option) MCQs for our tRATs, so I couldn©öt justify giving 1
mark to the students who have exhausted all the options.
If you have A-E then I can see 4, 3, 2, 1 (0) making more sense.
I wonder whether one gets more discussion with the 4/2/1/0 option. The
fact that getting it right first time is worth double the points may
encourage students to spend more time thinking/discussing their preferred
response and coming to a proper consensus. But that is just a gut feeling
- I wonder if anyone has tried to see whether it actually makes any
difference? Does anyone know of data on this?
Josie ?
Dr Josie A Fraser
Senior Lecturer in Pharmacology, Bradford School of Pharmacy
Associate Dean for Learning & Teaching, Faculty of Life Sciences
School of Pharmacy
Faculty of Life Sciences
University of Bradford
Bradford
West Yorkshire
BD7 1DP
T: (+44)(0)1274 234663
E: [log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>
On 16/01/2015 14:05, "DrL" <[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>> wrote:
Hi,
What is the most popular grading system for tRATs? One point off for
each wrong answer (4,3,2,1) or reduce by half for each wrong answer
(4,2,1,0)? Other methods? What are the pro and cons?
R Roy Lindquist, M.D.
University of Connecticut
School of Medicine
---
This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus
protection is active.
http://www.avast.com
|
