TEAMLEARNING-L Archives

Team-Based Learning

TEAMLEARNING-L@LISTS.UBC.CA

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show HTML Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Edward McKee <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Edward McKee <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 3 Nov 2010 15:43:14 -0400
Content-Type:
multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (2132 bytes) , text/html (9 kB)
I echo Michael on this. I especially like the way this process can improve
questions on a newly written TBL, but they have to write a clearly improved
question to get  credit. I also do this via email. I don't like wasting
class time on semantic details. The evidence that this works, is that
semantic issues disappear after the TBL as been used several times.

 

   Ed McKee

 

From: Team-Based Learning [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf
Of Sweet, Michael S
Sent: Wednesday, November 03, 2010 1:21 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Question about the appeals process for RATs

 

I recommend that if they are building a case on wording, they have to submit
the question re-written so that it tests the same knowledge but is clearer.
If they do it convincingly, then spiffy-you have a better question to use
next time.  If they just dumb-down the question, then you have to explain to
them what their question leaves out.

 

Regardless, I recommend appeals ALWAYS be handled after the class:  often
folks do it over e-mail.  Face to face discussion about appeals right after
the RAP leads to too much emotion-laden bickering.

 

-M

 

 

From: Team-Based Learning [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf
Of Jacobson, Trudi E
Sent: Wednesday, November 03, 2010 12:14 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Question about the appeals process for RATs

 

I wonder if I can get the benefit of your advice about appeals.  I don't
have them very often, but did today. The team's reason for appealing had no
merit (and was based on confusing wording, rather than factual error, so
there is no evidence the students went back to the readings to follow up).
My inclination in a case like this is not to award any points just for
appealing, but I do know that others think a bit of credit is due for
undertaking the appeal.  I would be most interested in knowing how others
think.  Is there a benefit to awarding a few points?

 

Thank you!

 

Trudi

 

Trudi E. Jacobson
Head of User Education Programs 
University Libraries 
University at Albany, SUNY 
1400 Washington Avenue 
Albany, NY 12222 
Phone 518/442-3581
Fax 518/442-3088
E-mail [log in to unmask] <mailto:[log in to unmask]> 
Editor of Public Services Quarterly 

 



ATOM RSS1 RSS2