TEAMLEARNING-L Archives

Team-Based Learning

TEAMLEARNING-L@LISTS.UBC.CA

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show HTML Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Chris Burns <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Chris Burns <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 11 Oct 2012 03:46:31 +0000
Content-Type:
multipart/related
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (4 kB) , text/html (18 kB) , image001.jpg (12 kB) , image002.jpg (106 kB)

Hi all,
I'm curious about how (those who do) you grade application exercises considering that they should ideally not have a clear single best answer. At my former and current institution we agreed not to grade GAEs to encourage faculty to push the limits and develop challenging applications that may have more than one correct answer.
Thanks for your input.
Chris BurnsUniversity of Illinois College of Medicine

Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2012 16:50:04 -0500
From: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: What is your grading scheme?
To: [log in to unmask]

Jim and Others,

My grading scheme creates 2 general categories, with sub-items in each one.  The specific points vary from time to time, but the last time I taught a course, here was the breakdown, with 200 points in the whole course:


Individual Work:  (100 Points)
  - iRATs (best 4 out of 5) - 20 pts
  - Bi-weekly journals - 30 pts
  - Teaching Portfolio - 15 

  - Learning Portfolio - 15
  - Individual Learning Project - 20

Group Work:  (100 Points)
  - gRATs  - 45 pts
  - Group Design Project - 30
  - Final Group Project - 25

The total points for the Group Work were adjusted for each person in the group, by multiplying them by the Peer Evaluation score that each person received from his/her group.  This Adjusted Group Component was then added to the points from the Individual Work, to create that person's Total Score for the course.


Dee Fink



On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 4:02 PM, Elizabeth Oldland <[log in to unmask]> wrote:









Hi Jim
TBL contributes to 20% of our overall unit (subject) score. Within this, each component is equally weighted.

So overall:
Exam 40%
Assignment 40%
TBL 20%
·        
iRAT 5%
·        
tRAT 5%
·        
Applications 5 %
·        
Peer evaluation 5%
 
regards
Elizabeth
Elizabeth Oldland


Lecturer

School of Nursing and Midwifery, Faculty of Health


Deakin University, Melbourne Burwood Campus, Australia

Phone: 03 9244 6608 International: +61 3 9244 6608

Fax: 03 9244 6118 International: +61 3 9244 6118

email: [log in to unmask]

Website: http://www.deakin.edu.au/nursing

Deakin University CRICOS Provider Code 00113B (Vic)




 
 
 


From: Team-Based Learning [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
On Behalf Of Sibley, James Edward

Sent: Thursday, 11 October 2012 7:18 AM

To: [log in to unmask]

Subject: What is your grading scheme?


 



Hi


 


I was just reading 


 


Dean Paramlee, Larry Michaelsen, Sandy Cook, Patrica Hudes 


 


Team-Based Learning : A practical guide


 


They presented a grading scheme


 


Article's Grading Scheme



 


iRAT 25%


tRAT 35%


Applications 35%


Peer Evaluation 5%


 


This is very different than the one we use


 


UBC Grading Scheme



 


iRAT 10%


tRAT 10%


Applications NOT GRADED


Peer Evaluation 5%


 


The reminder individual things like papers, problem set, midterms


 


#############################


 


What does your grading scheme look like?



--



Jim Sibley 

Director 

Centre for Instructional Support 

Faculty of Applied Science 

University of British Columbia 

2205-6250 Applied Science Lane 

Vancouver, BC Canada 

V6T 1Z4 



Phone 604.822.9241 

Fax 604.822.7006 



Email: [log in to unmask]


 


Check out http://www.teambasedlearning.org






© Copyright 2012, Jim Sibley, All rights reserved The information contained in this e-mail message and any attachments (collectively "message") is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the recipient (or recipients)
 named above. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you have received this message in error and that any review, use, distribution, or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this
 in error, please notify the sender immediately by e-mail, and delete the meesage.







Important Notice: The contents of this email are intended solely for the named addressee and are confidential; any unauthorised use, reproduction or storage of the contents is expressly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please delete it and any attachments immediately and advise the sender by return email or telephone.


Deakin University does not warrant that this email and any attachments are error or virus free.



-- 
***********************
L. Dee Fink          
234 Foreman Ave.
Norman, OK  73069
Phone/FAX:  405-364-6464
Email:  [log in to unmask]

Websites:       
        www.designlearning.org   [multiple resources on course design]
        www.deefinkandassociates.com   [offer workshops & online courses]

        www.finkconsulting.info  [Fink's consulting activities & publications]

**Former President of the POD Network in Higher Education (2004-2005) 

**Author of: Creating Significant Learning Experiences (2003, Jossey-Bass)
**National Project Director:  Teaching & Curriculum Improvement (TCI) Project
**Senior Associate, Dee Fink & Associates Consulting Services




 		 	   		  

ATOM RSS1 RSS2