TEAMLEARNING-L Archives

Team-Based Learning

TEAMLEARNING-L@LISTS.UBC.CA

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show HTML Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Alison Hartley <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Alison Hartley <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 10 Sep 2015 07:56:24 +0000
Content-Type:
multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (4 kB) , text/html (9 kB)


Hello everyone,





I have watched this thread with some interest.  We use TBL on a full programme level for a large undergraduate pharmacy course at the University of Bradford in the UK, cohort size typically 150 students, typical age range 18-22 years.





There is no question about the value of non graded application exercises and I personally favour that approach, I almost always perceive the greatest learning is happening when there is not really one best answer at all, I'm sure some of you would agree.  However, I thought it may be useful to share our experiences, acknowledging that there may be some differences between students on different courses and in different countries, and also that whilst we all love TBL I think it is important to air some of the less comfortable issues I am sure we have all struggled with.





We have almost 100% attendance at iRAT/tRAT sessions.  We have had significantly worse attendance at application exercise sessions despite the fact that some are graded.  This led to an increase in the proportion of marks allocated to application exercises within a set unit of study.  Attendance improved.  Great!  However, this means that our grading processes need to be extremely robust and the administrative burden associated with this is significant.  Were no exercises graded, staff would be able to focus their time on creating more high quality materials rather than on marking. Our feedback mechanisms still require some improvement but to give good quality feedback to teams again takes time.  Significantly for us it also means that students pass on the materials to earlier years, meaning we cannot use that particular activity again for summative purposes, we tend to use our 'best' activities for the marked exercises and then by doing so we shoot ourselves in the foot as we cannot use again in the short term.  Our students are engaged, enrolled on a professional health course and we spend time at the start of each year talking about the ethos of TBL, the ethics etc and yet between groups we continue to have low level 'sharing' of materials (or cheating, you could call it).





So for the time being, despite the negatives associated with grading application exercises they will remain, if I'm honest I wish we were brave enough, and our students mature enough, to drop grading altogether.





We still however encourage faculty to continue to use exercises with no 'right answer'.





Example 1 (where this is one best answer) - max of 10 marks available



  *   2 marks for correct answer

  *   8 marks for rationale, including why discounted other options



Example 2 (where this is NOT one best answer) - max of 10 marks available



  *   ​all 10 marks for rationale









Alison Hartley

Curriculum Development Associate

Faculty of Health Studies



[log in to unmask]

01274 236397

Room 3.16







________________________________

From: Team-Based Learning <[log in to unmask]> on behalf of Massey, William V <[log in to unmask]>

Sent: 09 September 2015 19:47

To: [log in to unmask]

Subject: Grading In-class Application Activities





Hello TBL Community,







I am a bit of a novice TBLer so looking for some advice if you would be so kind. I am working on a way to grade the in-class applications, as it is a substantial part of the course expectations and student work. I was thinking of doing this in a two-fold manner – 1.) having a “right” answer to the applications that the groups could scratch off on the IFAT form after they have discussed and debated across groups (I would likely make this open to appeals as well); and 2.) developing some type of process feedback form in which each group would get a score at the end of a session (assessing things such as team interactions/dynamics, engagement, sound rationale behind answers during simultaneous reporting, others?!?).







I would love any feedback or resources if there are any out there.







Many thanks!











William Massey, PhD



Assistant Professor of Occupational Therapy



School of Health Professions



Concordia University Wisconsin



Office: HS 143



262-243-2073



[log in to unmask]







________________________________



To unsubscribe from the TEAMLEARNING-L list, please click here.<https://lists.ubc.ca/scripts/wa.exe?SUBED1=TEAMLEARNING-L&A=1>



Further information about the UBC Mailing Lists service can be found on the UBC IT website.



########################################################################



To unsubscribe from the TEAMLEARNING-L list, please click the following link:

https://lists.ubc.ca/scripts/wa.exe?SUBED1=TEAMLEARNING-L&A=1



Further information about the UBC Mailing Lists service can be found on the UBC IT website.


ATOM RSS1 RSS2