TEAMLEARNING-L Archives

Team-Based Learning

TEAMLEARNING-L@LISTS.UBC.CA

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show HTML Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Jill Atkinson <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Jill Atkinson <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 6 Oct 2009 11:50:50 -0400
Content-Type:
multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (2905 bytes) , text/html (3742 bytes)
I think the beauty of the IF-AT is the immediate feedback, so be sure 
that they do continue scratching until they get the right answer. 
Attaching partial points means that they will continue to think and 
try and get the right answer with each additional scratch, as opposed 
to simply uncovering all of the remaining boxes until they see the star.

jill

At 11:26 AM 10/6/2009, Fritz Laux wrote:
>Christine et al.:
>
>At the suggestion of a student, I give 4 point, if they get it on 
>the first scratch; then 2 points on the second scratch, then 1, and then .5.
>
>The students think this is funny.  It's obsessively complicated but 
>they also appreciating the logic/fairness, that it is much better to 
>get it on the first scratch than the second scratch.
>
>Best,  Fritz Laux
>---
>
>On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 5:30 AM, Christine Kuramoto 
><<mailto:[log in to unmask]>[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>Hi,
>
>I was wondering if anyone uses the if-at in a strictly 'right or 
>wrong' way rather than 3 points for correct answer, 2 on second try, 
>1 on third (or whatever other variation).  I've used the system for 
>both the iRAT and tRAT, but my students are used to black and white 
>tests, so don't seem to appreciate the partial credit for partial 
>knowledge system.
>
>I'm thinking that it might be better to just say you get points if 
>it's the right answer and nothing if it's wrong--that's something 
>they understand.  The partial credit for partial knowledge system 
>also tends to really inflate the grades (which could be considered 
>good, but here just seems to give me a reputation as teacher of the 
>class that everyone passes).  I get the feeling that even colleagues 
>think that if someone's not failing, then the class is too easy (but 
>have no evidence to back up this "feeling").
>
>Any thoughts on this?
>
>C
>
>--
>*******
>Christine Kuramoto, Assistant Professor: Medical English
>Kyushu University, Department of Medical Education
>Faculty of Medical Sciences
>3-1-1 Maidashi, Higashi-ku, Fukuoka, 812-8582 Japan
>Phone: (+81)92-642-6186 Fax: (+81)92-642-6188
>E-mail: <mailto:[log in to unmask]>[log in to unmask]
>

<http://psyc.queensu.ca/psyc_people_06/faculty_pages06/atkinson.html>Jill 
L. Atkinson, PhD.
Associate Professor and
Chair of Undergraduate Studies
<http://psyc.queensu.ca/>Dept. of Psychology
<http://www.queensu.ca/homepage/>Queen's University
Kingston, ON  K7L 3N6

Office: <http://www.queensu.ca/pps/access/humph.html>Humphrey Hall, Room 224
( :   (613) 533-6018
Fax: (613) 533-2499
Email: 
<mailto:[log in to unmask]>jill<mailto:[log in to unmask]>[log in to unmask]



----------
This email message is intended only for the addressee(s) and contains 
information that may be confidential and/or copyrighted.  If you are 
not the intended recipient, please notify the sender by reply e-mail 
and delete this e-mail immediately.  Use, disclosure or reproduction 
of this e-mail by anyone other than the intended recipient(s) is 
strictly prohibited.  


ATOM RSS1 RSS2