My process is that after the T-RAT I assign research questions and then
reveal the application exercise question for which the research questions
provide background. When a team completes their T-RAT, I give them the
research questions. Some teams get out their books and start working on
them and some plan to do them later. Incidentally the research questions
are an individual homework activity but they are free to work on them
together.
I try to wait until all teams have finished before I reveal the application
exercise question. The only time I release it before then is if it's
getting close to the end of class time and the last team might have to go
over.
On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 5:03 PM, Neil Haave <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> Hi Mark,
>
> Good question. I have struggled with this situation a lot since I started
> to implement TBL a couple of years ago.
>
> I don't think you should feel that you are treating other teams unfairly
> by discussing course material further with teams that finish early. Another
> way of saying this is I don't think we should penalize students who are
> ready for me before others; no sense in holding back students who are
> progressing faster than others. However, as an instructor we do need to
> keep our radar alert for other teams who may need our attention. As long as
> this is being done I really can't see a problem with sitting down with an
> early completing team.
>
> A couple of suggestions to consider if there is a marked difference in
> completion time between teams:
>
> 1. Institute a five minute rule that others have suggested in this forum
> (which I intend to try when I next teach a TBL course).
>
> 2. Have bonus apps prepared for teams to attempt. I have used this
> approach extensively and it ends up serving two purposes. A) gives early
> completing teams something to do. B) provides an incentive for slower teams
> to focus a bit more because they are missing out on bonus material.
>
> Cheers
>
> Neil Haave
> Augustana Campus, University of Alberta
>
>
> On Wednesday, November 20, 2013, Mark Stevens wrote:
>
>> Hi all. TBL instructors often wonder what they should do when one team
>> finishes a team exercise before the other teams. Like many of you, I try to
>> think of an additional activity or question for the early finishers to work
>> on while the other teams finish up. I tried something new yesterday that
>> seemed to work well, but I have some concerns and wanted to see if you
>> think my concerns are warranted.
>>
>> One team in my class yesterday finished much earlier than I was
>> expecting, so I gave them a few additional tasks to work on while the other
>> team continued working on the exercise. Once the early-finishing team had
>> completed its additional tasks (and it was clear that the other team was
>> still going to be working on the exercise for a while), I decided to sit
>> down with the early-finishing team to debrief their work on the extra
>> tasks. I enjoyed this debriefing session, and it kept the team members more
>> engaged in the class and material than they otherwise would have been. I
>> got to cover some non-essential but nevertheless relevant material with
>> that team that I wouldn't have been able to cover in the post exercise
>> discussion, because I knew there would only be time to discuss the
>> essential material. Overall, I think this debriefing session was valuable
>> for the early-finishing team.
>>
>> My concern, though, is whether it is problematic to spend time chatting
>> with one time while the other team is working on the exercise. I don't
>> think our chatting was a distraction to the still-working team, but the
>> team that I chatted with had an opportunity to "learn more" than the team
>> that was still working, which could be viewed as "unfair". On the other
>> hand, more learning is arguably better than less learning, even if the the
>> "more learning" is unevenly distributed across the students.
>>
>> Does anyone have any thoughts on this issue?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Mark
>>
>> --
>> Mark Stevens, PhD, MCIP
>> Assistant Professor, School of Community & Regional Planning
>> University of British Columbia
>> 223-1933 West Mall
>> Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z2, Canada
>> SCARP bio: http://www.scarp.ubc.ca/people/mark-stevens
>> Planning Evaluation Lab: http://www.planningevaluationlab.ca
>> 604-822-0657
>>
>>
>
> --
> *Neil Haave, PhD* | Associate Professor (Biology) | University of
> Alberta, Augustana Campus | 4901 - 46 Avenue, Camrose, AB T4V 2R3 | vox: 780
> 679 1506 | fax: 780 679 1129 | [log in to unmask] |
> www.augustana.ualberta.ca/profs/nhaave/
>
> *~ Earned knowledge penetrates deeper than received knowledge ~*
>
>
--
Herb Coleman, Ph.D
Dir. Instructional Computing and Technology
Adjunct Professor of Psychology
Austin Community College
Highland Business Center
5930 Middle Fiskville Rd.
Austin, TX 78752
[log in to unmask]
512-223-7746
********************************************************************************
Saruman believes it is only great power that can hold evil in check, but
that is not what I have found. I found it is the small everyday deeds of
ordinary folk that keep the darkness at bay. Small acts of kindness and
love. — Gandalf the Grey from the 2012 motion picture "The Hobbit"
*********************************************************************************
|
