TEAMLEARNING-L Archives

Team-Based Learning

TEAMLEARNING-L@LISTS.UBC.CA

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show HTML Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Jorden C. Sahl" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Jorden C. Sahl
Date:
Tue, 11 Mar 2008 10:31:32 -0400
Content-Type:
multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (1347 bytes) , text/html (4 kB)
Hi Everyone,
I recently finished my second Introductory Psychology course using TBL.
I have a question that is not that complicated but for some reason I
can't get myself around the math and I want to double check with other
TBL users before I teach it again. 
 
I used the Peer Evaluation form from the TBL book that assigns an
average of 10 points, with one 9 and at least one 11 (max 15). A student
asked me - so what does my average have to be to get "perfect" on the
peer evaluations? And I was stumped (I had just never thought of it that
way)
 
The max anyone can get would be 15, so I would assume in the rare case
scenario of one person getting all 15s from their peers that would be
"perfect". But then, if 10 is average, is 10 "perfect" (I.e., if someone
gets an average of 10, do they get 100% on peer evaluations, with the
possibility for students to get higher than 100%)? (My class picked 30%
for the peer evaluations grade weight). Calculating it this way (10 is
100%) increases everyone's grade quite a bit (about half a letter
grade), which I don't have a problem with, as long as it is correct!
 
I am second guessing myself with the math and want some input before I
use this method again. 
Thanks so much.

 

Jorden Cummings Sahl, M.A.

Graduate Student, Clinical Psychology

Depression & Wellness Research Lab (302.831.2215)

University of Delaware

Newark, DE  19716

[log in to unmask]

 

 



ATOM RSS1 RSS2