Hi Steve


I would say there is no problem with a class of that size.


We use TBL in an Introduction to Engineering course with 1800 students.


The lectures are 6 sections of 300 students, and the design studios are 30 sections of 60 students.


We use teams of 6 (300 teams) and provide a specific map for each classroom so students sit with their teammates. The teams are the same in class and in the design studio.  (A bit of scheduling magic is required here).


I have attached a paper about the course.


Each week has the same rhythm 


1 or 2 videos are released on Friday night to help students prepare for the following week. Videos are 8-10 minutes in length and each video has about 10 embedded MCQ questions (these questions are simple retrieval questions). The videos are connected to Canvas grade book so students get a point for completing the video.


The week has two one-hour lectures separated by a 2-hour design studio. The premise is the first class of the week is to set up studio experience and the second class is to consolidate studio learning and pivot to the following week.


The first class of the team complete a 6-question TRAT using the IFAT cards. We use a timed PPT deck to cycle through questions so TRAT takes exactly 9 minutes in total. The rest of class time is heavily activity based using the principles of TBL 4S design. We often use Mentimeter (with heat maps and 2 by 2 matrices) or Google docs for simultaneous reporting (as well as traditional voting cards)


The instructor will use the classroom map to cycle around quadrants of the room and keep track of teams as they respond. This keeps teams on their toes since they could be cold-called.


The studio is also heavily activity-based and often provides time for students to work on the module projects and deliverables. A Canvas dropbox is used for every studio to gather worksheets from teams. This requires 30 drop boxes a week! The Canvas grade book has a few thousand columns by the end of the semester.


The final class of the week is also heavily activity-based.


I would recommend talking to the instructor that built all this - Pete Ostafichuk - he is a pedagogical savant and designs and delivers the most amazing courses, I can introduce you if you want.


Jim







Visit my TBL website at www.learntbl.ca

_______________________________________

Jim Sibley and Amanda Bradley
106-2575 West 4th Ave.
Vancouver, BC
Canada

h 604-564-1043
w 604-822-9241
c 778-998-9241






On Tue, Jun 14, 2022 at 12:33 AM Steve Cayzer <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

Hi TBLers

 

I have been tasked with redesigning a 1st year undergraduate module in Engineering covering ‘responsible engineering practices’

 

It’s a really great opportunity to get TBL embedded into the Engineering Syllabus.

I have absolutely no problem thinking of great 4S activities (for example, ethical dilemmas in engineering practice) and am confident of designing a really compelling course.

 

Where  I am slightly less confident is that this cohort is quite large – 350 students, probably 70 teams (personal tutor groups – hence slightly smaller than TBLC recommendation, I might push for 6 people as a default).

 

Here are the challenges I am wondering about

  • With 350 people in 1 (big) lecture hall, will the acoustics be deafening when teams are working together?
  • With only a fraction of teams being able to report back (due to timing) during task debrief, will some teams start to disengage?

 

Any tips for dealing with this would be welcome!

 

Bw and thanks

 

Steve

PS and of course if anyone has delivered a similar course, would be interested to hear from you too



To unsubscribe from the TEAMLEARNING-L list, please click here.

Further information about the UBC Mailing Lists service can be found on the UBC IT website.



To unsubscribe from the TEAMLEARNING-L list, please click here.

Further information about the UBC Mailing Lists service can be found on the UBC IT website.