Hello everybody, I'd like to ask you some tips on correcting and grading application exercises. Do you use a sort of rubric for each assignment? That is to say, you decide to give full marks for the right explanation and the right letter, about 80% of the maximum if they understand the reason behind but choose the wrong letter... and so on? I am about to correct more or less 11 application activities for each teams (there are 10 teams...) for a total of more than 100 exercises... I need something fair, so that teams who have reasoned well can be rewarded, but also simple, because I'd rather not spend hours and hours on them. In our grading system top mark is 30/30 and pass mark 18/30, so there are many possibilities to discriminate between two different grades. Any suggestion you can give me will be helpful. Thank you very much-- Marina ********************************************************** Marina Di Carro, PhD Department of Chemistry and Industrial Chemistry University of Genoa Via Dodecaneso, 31 16146 Genova - Italy tel +39 010 3536198 +39 010 3536173 fax +39 010 3536190 email address: [log in to unmask] ********************************************************** ######################################################################## To unsubscribe from the TEAMLEARNING-L list, please click the following link: https://lists.ubc.ca/scripts/wa.exe?SUBED1=TEAMLEARNING-L&A=1 Further information about the UBC Mailing Lists service can be found on the UBC IT website.