Hi Jen, At Iowa State University, we have developed a peer assessment tool using the ThinkSpace platform (www.ThinkSpace.org)<http://www.ThinkSpace.org)>. This tool is flexible with a template for the traditional TBL peer assessment approach using a set number of points to be distributed among team members, but also allows you to use other approaches, such as scores based on categories of behaviors. What I like about the tool is that once students have entered the scores, it creates a report for each person with her/his scores and the(anonymous) comments from the other members of the team. I have the option to review the comments if I want, but then I hit send and the reports are send via email to each individual. It saves a tremendous amount of time – which is why we developed the tool. Best, Jane Jane Rongerude, PhD Assistant Professor Department of Community and Regional Planning Iowa State University 477 College of Design Ames, IA 50011 Phone: (515) 294-5289 Email: [log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]> From: Team-Based Learning <[log in to unmask]> on behalf of Jen Wrye <[log in to unmask]> Reply-To: Jen Wrye <[log in to unmask]> Date: Wednesday, February 8, 2017 at 10:33 PM To: "[log in to unmask]" <[log in to unmask]> Subject: Questions from a novice Hi everyone, I’m a new TBL adopter. So far things feel like they’re going well, but I’m hoping for guidance on a couple matters. 1. PEER FEEDBACK: How can I collect & distribute peer feedback effectively & efficiently? Our LMS is Blackboard, and we don’t seem to have a function that allows students to anonymously give each other feedback on their ‘helping behavior’ (or does it?). Students who hand write feedback could be identified by their teammates. I could collect it via. email, but that seems labour intensive for me. I’ve promised anonymity this time, but might revisit later. Any ideas or insights? 2. AN INEFFECTIVE GROUP: I understand peer feedback might help matters. Baring a shift, one of my groups is not working. One member is super strong. Two are ok. Three are weaker. The strong member does all talking, writing, representing for his group. He tries to ask other members’ opinions, but mostly they choose to add nothing, and he moves things forward. Any suggestions to change this dynamic without becoming overbearing? Thanks for considering responding to these questions. Looking forward to lots more engagement on the listserv. Best, Jen Jen Wrye, PhD Instructor, Department of Humanities & Social Sciences North Island College 2300 Ryan Road Courtenay, BC V9N 8N6 (250) 334-5030 [log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]> I’m grateful to live in the traditional, unceded territories of the K’ómoks First Nation. ________________________________ To unsubscribe from the TEAMLEARNING-L list, please click here.<https://lists.ubc.ca/scripts/wa.exe?SUBED1=TEAMLEARNING-L&A=1> Further information about the UBC Mailing Lists service can be found on the UBC IT website. ######################################################################## To unsubscribe from the TEAMLEARNING-L list, please click the following link: https://lists.ubc.ca/scripts/wa.exe?SUBED1=TEAMLEARNING-L&A=1 Further information about the UBC Mailing Lists service can be found on the UBC IT website.