I agree that the questions could be tailored to the TBL model.  For example
I hope this helps, Diann Martin, RN PhD

-----Original Message-----
From: Amanda Rees <[log in to unmask]>
To: TEAMLEARNING-L <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Wed, Apr 6, 2016 7:21 pm
Subject: Re: Course Evaluations

JeeHae

I was just about to send out the same email.  I hope you'll consider sharing your findings

Manda

Sent from my iPhone

On Apr 6, 2016, at 5:44 PM, JeeHae Nam <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

Hello everyone,

I have a question about course evaluations. This was my first year trying to implement TBL into my course. However, given the different nature of the class and poor structure, I feel that the traditional course evaluation questions are not as applicable. I am pasting below the usual questions that are asked of students university-wide at Boston College. I am thinking that I would want to include more process-oriented questions, but I wanted to ask the group on thoughts and recommendations. 

Any thoughts or examples would be appreciated!

PART A

Note to students: Responses to Part A are anonymously reported to the faculty member, the department chair, the deans, and made available in summary form to other students.
Instructor
1.Which of the following statements apply to this instructor?
 a.The instructor was prepared.
   
Strongly Agree
Agree
Uncertain
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
 b.The instructor was available for help outside of class.
   
Strongly Agree
Agree
Uncertain
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
 c.The instructor returned assignments/tests conscientiously.
   
Strongly Agree
Agree
Uncertain
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
 d.The instructor showed enthusiasm about the subject matter.
   
Strongly Agree
Agree
Uncertain
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
 e.The instructor stimulated interest in the subject matter.
   
Strongly Agree
Agree
Uncertain
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
 f.The instructor’s explanations were clear.
   
Strongly Agree
Agree
Uncertain
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
 g.The instructor treated students with respect.
   
Strongly Agree
Agree
Uncertain
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
2.How would you rate this instructor overall as a teacher?
   
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor
Course
3.Which of the following statements apply to this course?
 a.The course was well organized.
   
Strongly Agree
Agree
Uncertain
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
 b.The course generally followed the syllabus.
   
Strongly Agree
Agree
Uncertain
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
 c.Class attendance was necessary for learning the course material.
   
Strongly Agree
Agree
Uncertain
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
 d.The course was intellectually challenging.
   
Strongly Agree
Agree
Uncertain
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
 e.Compared to similar courses (i.e. core, major, etc.), this course required:
   
Much More Effort
More Effort
About the Same Effort
Less Effort
Much Less Effort
4.How would you rate this course overall?
   
Excellent
Very Good
Good
Fair
Poor

PART B

Note to students: Responses to the open-ended questions are anonymously reported to the instructor, the department chair, and the deans.
1. What are the strengths of this course? 2. How could the instructor improve the course? 3. Would you recommend this course to other students, majors etc.? Why or why not? 4. Additional comments:


To unsubscribe from the TEAMLEARNING-L list, please click here.
Further information about the UBC Mailing Lists service can be found on the UBC IT website.


To unsubscribe from the TEAMLEARNING-L list, please click here.
Further information about the UBC Mailing Lists service can be found on the UBC IT website.


To unsubscribe from the TEAMLEARNING-L list, please click here.

Further information about the UBC Mailing Lists service can be found on the UBC IT website.