Neil,

One question option is distribute points among recipients.

This is from their website.

Distribute points (among recipients) question

Distribute points (among recipients) question is similar to Distribute points (among recipients) question. For this question type, students split points among the recipients of the question.
For example, if the question recipient is set to the giver's team members, and points to distribute in total is 100, students are required to split the 100 points among his team members. 

You can also specify Points to distribute per recipient, which multiplies the points specified by the number of options or recipients.
For example, if there are 5 team members and Points to distribute per recipient is set to 100, students will have to split 500 points in total to the 5 members.


Jerry J. Bugni, II
Automotive Technology
Northern Michigan University
1401 Presque Isle Avenue
Marquette, MI  49855
906.227.1538



On Dec 18, 2014, at 11:16 AM, Sweet, Michael <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

Neil,

I’m not sure about that.  I haven’t explored all it’s possible options.  I just dialed it in to replicate my process.  If you find out, let us know! :-)

-M


Michael Sweet, Ph.D.
Senior Associate Director
Center for Teaching & Learning Through Research
Northeastern University
215-F Snell Library
360 Huntington Avenue
Boston, MA 02115
ph: 617.373.2833


From: Neil Haave <[log in to unmask]>
Date: Thursday, December 18, 2014 at 11:08 AM
To: Michael Sweet <[log in to unmask]>
Cc: "[log in to unmask]" <[log in to unmask]>
Subject: Re: Excellent, free online peer evaluation system for TBL

Hi Michael,

This looks very interesting. Is it possible to set it up so that students have only sufficient points to award 100 points to each team member such that they have to make critical decisions if they wish to award someone more than 100 (someone then needs to receive less than 100).

It wasn't clear to me from the YouTube video that this was possible.

Thanks

Neil

Neil Haave, PhD
Associate Professor, Biology
University of Alberta, Augustana Faculty
Rm C155, Science Wing, Classroom Building, Augustana Campus
4901 - 46 Avenue, Camrose, AB, CANADA   T4V 2R3
blog

"We do not learn from experience . . . we learn from reflecting on experience" - John Dewey

On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 6:47 AM, Sweet, Michael <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
Friends,

Folks may already be aware of this, but this semester I piloted TEAMMATES, an online peer evaluation system run out of the National University of Singapore.

In my opinion, it is superior to CATME in ease-of-use, and I used it to exactly replicate my existing form and process.  

Students need not create an account, and you can cut-n-paste a spreadsheet of student names into a web field and it automatically makes correct team associations.

I highly recommend this system.  It’s here:  http://teammatesv4.appspot.com   (with a pretty self-explanatory Video Tour on the front page).

-Michael


Michael Sweet, Ph.D.
Senior Associate Director
Center for Teaching & Learning Through Research
Northeastern University
215-F Snell Library
360 Huntington Avenue
Boston, MA 02115