Neil, One question option is distribute points among recipients. This is from their website. Distribute points (among recipients) question Distribute points (among recipients) question is similar to Distribute points (among recipients) question. For this question type, students split points among the recipients of the question. For example, if the question recipient is set to the giver's team members, and points to distribute in total is 100, students are required to split the 100 points among his team members. You can also specify Points to distribute per recipient, which multiplies the points specified by the number of options or recipients. For example, if there are 5 team members and Points to distribute per recipient is set to 100, students will have to split 500 points in total to the 5 members. Jerry J. Bugni, II Automotive Technology Northern Michigan University 1401 Presque Isle Avenue Marquette, MI 49855 906.227.1538 On Dec 18, 2014, at 11:16 AM, Sweet, Michael <[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>> wrote: Neil, I’m not sure about that. I haven’t explored all it’s possible options. I just dialed it in to replicate my process. If you find out, let us know! :-) -M Michael Sweet, Ph.D. Senior Associate Director Center for Teaching & Learning Through Research Northeastern University 215-F Snell Library 360 Huntington Avenue Boston, MA 02115 ph: 617.373.2833 northeastern.edu/learningresearch<http://northeastern.edu/learningresearch> From: Neil Haave <[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>> Date: Thursday, December 18, 2014 at 11:08 AM To: Michael Sweet <[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>> Cc: "[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>" <[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>> Subject: Re: Excellent, free online peer evaluation system for TBL Hi Michael, This looks very interesting. Is it possible to set it up so that students have only sufficient points to award 100 points to each team member such that they have to make critical decisions if they wish to award someone more than 100 (someone then needs to receive less than 100). It wasn't clear to me from the YouTube video that this was possible. Thanks Neil Neil Haave, PhD Associate Professor, Biology Managing Editor, Collected Essays on Learning and Teaching<http://celt.uwindsor.ca/ojs/leddy/index.php/CELT/index> University of Alberta, Augustana Faculty Rm C155, Science Wing, Classroom Building, Augustana Campus 4901 - 46 Avenue, Camrose, AB, CANADA T4V 2R3 email<mailto:[log in to unmask]> Augustana dossier<http://www.augustana.ualberta.ca/profs/nhaave/> Google+<https://www.google.com/+NeilHaave> blog<http://activelylearning2teach.blogspot.ca/> "We do not learn from experience . . . we learn from reflecting on experience" - John Dewey On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 6:47 AM, Sweet, Michael <[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>> wrote: Friends, Folks may already be aware of this, but this semester I piloted TEAMMATES, an online peer evaluation system run out of the National University of Singapore. In my opinion, it is superior to CATME in ease-of-use, and I used it to exactly replicate my existing form and process. Students need not create an account, and you can cut-n-paste a spreadsheet of student names into a web field and it automatically makes correct team associations. I highly recommend this system. It’s here: http://teammatesv4.appspot.com<http://teammatesv4.appspot.com/> (with a pretty self-explanatory Video Tour on the front page). -Michael Michael Sweet, Ph.D. Senior Associate Director Center for Teaching & Learning Through Research Northeastern University 215-F Snell Library 360 Huntington Avenue Boston, MA 02115 ph: 617.373.2833<tel:617.373.2833> northeastern.edu/learningresearch<http://northeastern.edu/learningresearch>