Ken, 

I totally agree with Josie and Jim. There is NO way to fix an out-of-class assignment. Most groups WILL divide up the work because it is so difficult to meet that the only way to get it done is for individuals to either take turns or do parts. The bad thing is that the set of conditions created by out-of-class assignments ALWAYS reduces learning AND results in free-riders. 

The other problem with the current assignment is that it is a case where "more is less" and doesn't meet any of the 4-S criteria. Even if you brought it into class so that students would be aware that they were working on the same problem and you could do a simultaneous report so that it fit 2 or the S's, it still wouldn't work for two reasons. One is that I don't think a task that general (pick 6 or 8 topics out of several chapters...--it is NOT a specific choice) would be seen by students as being significant. I'd bet that if you had students rate the assignment on a scale of 1 (busy-work) to 10 (significant) most would rate it 2 or lower. Also, assuming that each of the groups actually did a great job and created a "gallery walk", it would take several posters per team to represent their work. The net effect is that the walls of the classroom would be completely covered and it would take so long for students to figure out what issues needed to be discussed that there wouldn't be time to discuss them. That's why it's so important to require students to make a specific choice. For example, you might give them a specific business situate (e.g. a current news report of company with a specific problem) and have students choose THE topic that most likely got the company into trouble in the first place and/or the topic that the company CEO would benefit most from knowing about. Asking for a specific choice would both create the thinking and discussion within the teams and create a lively discussion after a simultaneous report.

I hope this helps.

Larry

On Thu, Oct 9, 2014 at 10:24 PM, Sibley, James Edward <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
Hi Ken

This is often the problem with product based out of class assignments.

If you are an A student and I am a C student....why not sit back and let you get me an A.

We can add peer evaluation to the mix...but it usually doesn't have enough teeth to make sure the freeloader gets a fair..low grade

In the cooperative/ collaborative world this kind of team dysfunction is all too common.

The issue is often with assignments that focus on product generation and not decision making. Groups are often not very good at building large products but can make difficult decisions together (think of the work of a courtroom jury in a difficult case)

Maybe you could consider bring the assignment into class and changing focus to decision making/discrimination.

###################

You could probably use something like Sophie Sparrow and Margaret Sova McCabe showed at the great workshop at the TBL conference in Austin

It would look like this

students individually prepare 6-8 key topics

they bring 2 copies to class

you collect one (this is only cursorily marked....just check mark....you tried)

then you do an in class activity where teams distill all their individual work into a group compilation...maybe even with some focusing....top 4 topics and why

you collect the team compilation and mark it more carefully and add it to the cursory participation mark from having submitted individual

#############################

You want to have class activities that build/incorporate their out of class work (the out of class work is most often individual)

For a short explanation of problem solving in TBL...you can visit my website at

http://learntbl.ca/what-is-tbl/structured-problem-solving/

take care

jim

________________________________________
From: Team-Based Learning [[log in to unmask]] on behalf of Ken Gunnells [[log in to unmask]]
Sent: Wednesday, October 08, 2014 7:57 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Problem assignment in a new class

I have a problem with an assignment in my face-to-face Management Information Systems
class. At the end of each 2-week module, the current out-of-class assignment has student
teams creating a summary of the key topics from the chapters and cases in the module.
They are supposed to relate each of approximately 6-8 key topics to the theme of the
module, demonstrate an understanding of the topic, and give examples of how businesses
have used or can use the topics to compete in the market place. The goals are for students
to be able to separate the important from the less important, and to give them the tools to
make better decisions in the future. The problem with this assignment is that teams have
taken a divide and conquer approach, and freeloading has become a problem, even in the
face of impending peer evaluations. I am also getting brain dumps and summaries of entire
chapters and cases, instead of the summaries of a few key topics. In order to reach my
goals for the assignment and to eliminate the freeloading problem, I need your help to
redesign it while I still have 3 modules yet to cover. If I could somehow find a way to
revise the assignment then I am confident I could dramatically improve the class.

Ken Gunnells, Ph.D.
COLLAT School of Business, Management Information Systems & Quantitative Methods
UAB | The University of Alabama at Birmingham
205-222-0871
[log in to unmask]



--
*******************************
Larry K. Michaelsen, Professor of Management
Dockery 400G, University of Central Missouri
Warrensburg, MO 64093
660/864-6497 cell, 660/543-8465 fax
For info on:
Team-Based Learning (TBL) <www.teambasedlearning.org
Integrative Business Experience (IBE) <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-7Y_Hrl6iRs&feature=youtu.bel>
*******************************