I have had this happen before. If two options are equally plausible, then I wrote a poor question for the RAP process. I would rescore all the iRATs and award full credit for either option.

​------
David Raeker-Jordan
Legal Methods Professor
Widener University School of Law
3800 Vartan Way
P.O. Box 69380
Harrisburg, PA 17106-9380
717.541.1996
Inline image 1

On Thu, Oct 2, 2014 at 9:05 AM, Andrew W Keitt <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
I know that appeals are only granted to teams, but I’m have some push back on this policy and am having trouble justifying it. Let’s say there are two answers and there is a good case to be made that they are equally plausible—the team picks the “correct” answer, but the individual student, although she has made a good argument for her choice, is out of luck. In a big class it’s not feasible to entertain each individual appeal, but apart from logistics I’m having a hard time justifying it.

Does anyone have a suggestion for how to deal with this?

Thanks!

Andrew Keitt