I have had this happen before. If two options are equally plausible, then I wrote a poor question for the RAP process. I would rescore all the iRATs and award full credit for either option. ------ David Raeker-Jordan Legal Methods Professor Widener University School of Law 3800 Vartan Way P.O. Box 69380 Harrisburg, PA 17106-9380 717.541.1996 [image: Inline image 1] On Thu, Oct 2, 2014 at 9:05 AM, Andrew W Keitt <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > I know that appeals are only granted to teams, but I’m have some push back > on this policy and am having trouble justifying it. Let’s say there are two > answers and there is a good case to be made that they are equally > plausible—the team picks the “correct” answer, but the individual student, > although she has made a good argument for her choice, is out of luck. In a > big class it’s not feasible to entertain each individual appeal, but apart > from logistics I’m having a hard time justifying it. > > Does anyone have a suggestion for how to deal with this? > > Thanks! > > Andrew Keitt >