Maryellen Weimer posted on her Teaching Professor blog a comment this week on an article from 2012 that discusses peer evaluation:
http://www.magnapubs.com/blog/teaching-and-learning/assessing-team-members/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+teaching-and-learning-feed+%28Teaching+%26+Learning+Blog+-+Magna+Publications%29

The paper she discusses is: 
Ohland, M.W., et al. (2012). The comprehensive assessment of team member effectiveness: Development of a behaviorally anchored rating scale for self- and peer evaluation. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 11 (4), 609-630.

The rubric developed is at the end of the article and may be of use in helping students articulate the reasons for giving a particular mark to their team-mates. Many of the elements look similar to the rubrics available on our TBLC website.

I have found, similar to Dee and Herb, that the only way I can get students to take the peer evaluation seriously is to have it impact their course grade. In my case, I make it a multiplier that impacts individual students' team marks.

Cheers

Neil

Neil Haave, PhD | Associate Professor | Dept of Science, Augustana Faculty, University of Alberta | Rm C155, Science Wing, Classroom Building, Augustana Campus 4901 - 46 Avenue, Camrose, AB, CANADA   T4V 2R3 | [log in to unmask]http://www.augustana.ualberta.ca/profs/nhaave/


On Thu, May 1, 2014 at 3:02 PM, Bridges, Kristie <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

Hello,

 

We were wondering how others handle the issue of students who do not take peer evaluation seriously.    We currently use iPeer and the Koles method but the results don’t count toward a grade.  With 2 classes of 200 students each and limited resources, it’s difficult to provide individual feedback to students regarding the quality of their comments.  Students who make inappropriate comments are reported for lack of professionalism but this happens very rarely.   Much more common issues include students copying and pasting identical feedback for multiple team members, using brief one-word responses or stating in the self-evaluation that their own performance is perfect.  They’ve been addressed as a class regarding this and are given examples of helpful/unhelpful responses but there currently are no individual or team consequences.  We’ve considered several options including grading the responses (probably not viable for us at this time), reporting all students whose responses don’t meet a minimum standard for lack of professionalism or making the entire group re-do the evaluation if any team member fails to take it seriously.  We’d love to hear how the rest of you handle this type of behavior.  Many thanks!

 

Regards,

Kristie Bridges

 

Kristie Grove Bridges, PhD

Associate Professor, Biomedical Sciences

WVSOM

400 N Lee St

Lewisburg, WV 24901

304-647-6223