I permit teams to give everyone the same mark if they wish. This has happened a couple of times in the past but not very often. I have found students to be pretty responsible about giving more/less marks to their peers when warranted. The couple of times when everyone received 100% on the team for participation, I had to agree with them - those couple of teams really did seem to be well integrated with different members taking on leadership roles at different times.
I administered peer evaluations mid-term, and reminded them they were not to give everyone on their team the exact same number of points, because not everyone does equal work, yada-yada-yada. However, I have had several teams try to "outsmart" the system by agreeing among themselves who will get a 9 or 11 from which team member, in essence making it so that everyone ultimately ends up with 40/40 points. I did have them do them in class, as I hadn't had time to put them on-line. Not sure if it would have made a difference. Suggestions??Judi
Judi Bradetich, M.S., M.M.
Lecturer, Development and Family Studies
Dept. of Educational Psychology
University of North Texas
DISCLAIMER: Any and all spelling mistakes contained in this email were inserted at the whim of my iPhone.