Whether or not it's a problem depends on the specifics of how your overall grading system works. I've always used a system where each member distributes an average of 10 points to the OTHER members and, when you have a really weak member, the opposite is more of a concern (i.e. it's an advantage to the "workers"). That's because:

1) Almost with exception, the non-contributors spread their points out as evenly as the distribution rules will allow. Thus, none of the "workers" gets a score that, by itself, is likely to have a significant impact on his or her grade.

2) the non-contributor will get very few points from the "workers"--thus, they (the "workers") have more points to distribute to each other."

In general, my advice would be to tell the worried students to be honest in their evaluations and let nature take its course. If you don't think justice has been done, then you might want to take an action that corrects the problem--but still treats everyone in the class in the same way. For example, you might consider is tossing out EVERYONE's highest and lowest scores and see if that solves the problem without creating any inequities in other groups.

I hope this helps. Good luck.

Larry

On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 12:35 AM, Tom Allen <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

A situation came up for me where a team of students wanted to know how a team member who missed a few RATs, when present rarely contributed, and almost always left at the break to miss the application exercises could fairly evaluate the team members on the peer evaluation form I distributed. They were concerned that their own evaluations would be unfairly skewed because the 'absent' student may evaluate on criteria irrelevant to the exercise. What would you do?

tom

-------------------------
Tom C. Allen
Instructor, Department of Criminology
Kwantlen Polytechnic University
12666-72nd Avenue
Surrey, B.C. V3W 2M8

Canada

office: 604 599-2649

cell: 604-782-3100
email: [log in to unmask]

www.kpu.ca

This e-mail and any attachments may be confidential or legally privileged. If you received this message in error or are not the
intended recipient, please destroy the e-mail message and any attachments or copies.

--

*******************************

Larry K. Michaelsen, Professor of Management

Dockery 400G, University of Central Missouri

Warrensburg, MO 64093

660/543-4315 voice, 660/543-8465 fax

For info on:

Team-Based Learning (TBL) <www.teambasedlearning.org> 

Integrative Business Experience (IBE) <http://ucmo.edu/IBEl>

*******************************