iRAT = 10% tRAT = 10% Applications = not graded Peer = 5% The remainder are individual writing assignments. ----------------- David Raeker-Jordan Legal Methods Professor Widener University School of Law Harrisburg, PA On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 4:17 PM, Sibley, James Edward <[log in to unmask]>wrote: > Hi > > I was just reading > > Dean Paramlee, Larry Michaelsen, Sandy Cook, Patrica Hudes > > Team-Based Learning : A practical guide > > They presented a grading scheme > > *Article's Grading Scheme* > > iRAT 25% > tRAT 35% > Applications 35% > Peer Evaluation 5% > > This is very different than the one we use > > *UBC Grading Scheme* > > iRAT 10% > tRAT 10% > Applications NOT GRADED > Peer Evaluation 5% > > The reminder individual things like papers, problem set, midterms > > ############################# > > What does your grading scheme look like? > -- > Jim Sibley > Director > Centre for Instructional Support > Faculty of Applied Science > University of British Columbia > 2205-6250 Applied Science Lane > Vancouver, BC Canada > V6T 1Z4 > > Phone 604.822.9241 > Fax 604.822.7006 > > Email: *[log in to unmask]* > > Check out *http:// <http://cis.apsc.ubc.ca/>www.teambasedlearning.org* > > > © Copyright 2012, Jim Sibley, All rights reserved The information > contained in this e-mail message and any attachments (collectively > "message") is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the > recipient (or recipients) named above. If the reader of this message is > not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you have received > this message in error and that any review, use, distribution, or copying of > this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this in error, > please notify the sender immediately by e-mail, and delete the meesage. >