iRAT = 10%
tRAT = 10%
Applications = not graded
Peer = 5%

The remainder are individual writing assignments.

-----------------
David Raeker-Jordan
Legal Methods Professor
Widener University School of Law
Harrisburg, PA



On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 4:17 PM, Sibley, James Edward <[log in to unmask]>wrote:

>   Hi
>
>  I was just reading
>
>  Dean Paramlee, Larry Michaelsen, Sandy Cook, Patrica Hudes
>
>  Team-Based Learning : A practical guide
>
>  They presented a grading scheme
>
>  *Article's Grading Scheme*
>
>  iRAT 25%
> tRAT 35%
> Applications 35%
> Peer Evaluation 5%
>
>  This is very different than the one we use
>
>  *UBC Grading Scheme*
>
>  iRAT 10%
> tRAT 10%
> Applications NOT GRADED
> Peer Evaluation 5%
>
>  The reminder individual things like papers, problem set, midterms
>
>  #############################
>
>  What does your grading scheme look like?
>  --
> Jim Sibley
> Director
> Centre for Instructional Support
> Faculty of Applied Science
> University of British Columbia
> 2205-6250 Applied Science Lane
> Vancouver, BC Canada
> V6T 1Z4
>
> Phone 604.822.9241
> Fax 604.822.7006
>
> Email: *[log in to unmask]*
>
>  Check out *http:// <http://cis.apsc.ubc.ca/>www.teambasedlearning.org*
>
>
> © Copyright 2012, Jim Sibley, All rights reserved The information
> contained in this e-mail message and any attachments (collectively
> "message") is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the
> recipient (or recipients) named above. If the reader of this message is
> not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you have received
> this message in error and that any review, use, distribution, or copying of
> this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this in error,
> please notify the sender immediately by e-mail, and delete the meesage.
>