On http://www.teambasedlearning.org/benefits it says Premium TBLC Member Only Content Modules SoTL Resources Workshop Materials I'm thinking that the last three should be indented. That said, it is rare (unknown?) in higher ed to have to pay for instructional materials developed by other instructors. One example that comes to mind is "Project Galileo" https://galileo.harvard.edu/login/ (I should add that there is far more empirical work that these techniques work than does TBL). Another example is the "International Journal for SoTL" http://academics.georgiasouthern.edu/ijsotl/v5n1.html which is also freely available. A third is Merlot http://www.merlot.org (ditto on material being freely available). Why would I want to contribute material for other instructors that is hidden behind a $60 paywall? I suspect that I'm missing something, but I'd much rather have my material freely available for anyone to use. Obviously we can now do that with the Internet. More broadly, I'd argue that such a paywall will hinder TBL. Finally, $60 is nearly what I pay for annual membership in my main academic organization, the American Economic Association. The "premium benefits" listed here sound much more like a commercial venture. The number of links on the main page that require a login (and TBLC membership, I presume) is disheartening. - Bill Jim said: > Hi Everyone > > I have completed the TBLC website update and merged the tbl.org site with > the tblc site > > Please let me know anything that doesn't work as expected....or if your > favourite resources has gone missing > > I am away for the next while....but will fix anything you point out when I > return > > All the best. jim -- Bill Goffe Department of Economics SUNY Oswego, 416 Mahar Hall Oswego, NY 13126 315-312-3444(v), 315-312-5444(f) [log in to unmask] http://cook.rfe.org