Hi everyone, I'm curious if/how others make adjustments to numeric evaluation scores when there are teams with huge variation within them. That is, I have a couple of teams where there are students who have basically 'dropped' the course but not officially - that is, they are technically still enrolled (and may show up on RAT days) but otherwise they are NEVER there so not surprisingly, their teammates gave them very low scores on the mid-semester evaluations. But because they have a fixed number of points to distributed to the team, that means they give the other team members significantly higher scores than the class average (so the missing student has an average score of around 2 but some of the other students have average scores WELL above 10). In contrast, I have a couple of teams where everyone is solid and contributing and so everyone has very similar scores, all close to the average. I use the evaluation scores as a weight but it seems sort of unfair that the students in the first team have weights that are disproportionately higher just because they have one team member who is a total slacker. Any advice/thoughts on how to deal with this situation? thanks! Jennifer