> Ed and others,
>
> On the *student* side, this sounds like a classic case of not spending
> sufficient time at the beginning of the course, orienting students to what
> the teachers were going to do and why, in a way that gets student buy-in.
> Whenver a teacher does something different than what students are used to,
> you need to spend a substantial amount of time (1-3 hours), helping
> students
> understand (via experiences - not explanations) what the teacher is going
> to
> do that is different and why he/she is changing. This is as true of TBL
> as
> anything else.
> If you haven't seen it yet, there was an article in the National
> Learning & Teaching Forum a few months ago that provides an excellent way
> to
> do that. (attached).
>
> On the *faculty* side, not so sure. It may be that someone needs to
> collect
> data on the qualityof student learning, in a way that can compare the
> quantity and quality of student learning with lecture vs. with TBL. My
> expectation would be that the latter is higher. If it is, that should be
> persuasive as a reason to change. If it isn't, either one needs to find
> out
> why it isn't higher - or else go back to lecturing.
>
> Dee
>
> On Wed, Jul 8, 2009 at 3:55 PM, Ed Bell <
[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
>> TBL Colleagues:
>> I coordinated a new course using TBL Spring 2009. This 3-credit course
>> (pharmacotherapeutics) is in the 2nd year of a 4-year professional
>> pharmacy
>> program (115 students). Three faculty taught (separate 5 week modules).
>> We
>> followed the TBL model very closely (ie, IRAT/GRAT, IF-AT forms, AE,
>> peer
>> evaluations). I attended the TBL conference in March. Final course
>> grades
>> overall were quite high. Student evaluations (8 pages total written
>> comments) post-course were "interesting" - most evaluations were
>> negative
>> and included several themes:
>> 1) students want more lecture - they want to be told what is important
>> 2) students believe we as faculty - the "experts"- should be telling
>> them
>> what is important about medications that they will need to know as a
>> future
>> pharmacist - this is our "responsibility" as faculty/teachers
>> 3) several students emphasized 2) above in light of our school being
>> private, with high tuition reasoning for responsibility of the faculty
>> to
>> tell students "what's important"
>> 4) some faculty this semester and due up next semester don't seem to
>> fully
>> accept TBL vs. still desiring to lecture
>> How do we respond to these student - and faculty - concerns? I
>> researched
>> the TBL list serve archives and found similar concerns from 2005
>> postings,
>> yet I am seeking additional recommendations and input from seasoned TBL
>> faculty.
>> Thank you.
>> Ed Bell (Drake University College of Pharmacy)
>>
>
>
>
> --
> ***********************
> L. Dee Fink
> 234 Foreman Ave.
> Norman, OK 73069
> Phone/FAX: 405-364-6464
> Email:
[log in to unmask]
> Website:
www.finkconsulting.info
>
> **National Project Director: Teaching & Curriculum Improvement (TCI)
> Project
> **Senior Associate, Dee Fink & Associates Consulting Services
> **Author of: Creating Significant Learning Experiences
> **Former President of the POD Network in Higher Education (2004-2005)
>