We have been using audience response system that permits the students to take the individual tests at their own pace. It require killing trees for the exams, but the beauty is that we don't have to have them go question by question - they can go back and forth as desired, AND, we have real-time data on how they perform on each item and quick scoring. I wouldn't want to do it any other way.
Sandy
**************************************************
Sandy Cook, PhD
Associate Dean for Curriculum Development
Duke/NUS Graduate School of Medicine
-----Original Message-----
From: Team Learning Discussion List on behalf of Gary D Lynne
Sent: Fri 4/11/2008 8:36 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Fw: IF-AT use
Scott, I am wondering what scanner technology you have been using? This
is one of the challenges with using this approach, on finding out, during
class which questions/concepts are creating problems for the students.
Being able to scan a score sheet, immediately, sounds like the way to go
(doing it while the Teams are working through the one- IF AT each team
fills out).
We have experimented with sampling... in a class of 48-students this
semester, randomly pulling out a 25% sample of the score sheets (which we
had made-up, using the "allocation of 4-points" for the case of 4-possible
answers, approach) they turn in before they go into the Team/IF AT part
of the exercise. Then, we hand grade those 12-score sheets, using clear
plastic overlays... having TA help here.. and then "lecture" only on what
the sample of 12 suggests are problem areas. This works to the extent the
sample is representative... but I would prefer having a scanner in class to
see how all 48-students handled the questions. Also, grading 48-score
sheets by plastic overlay/by hand is tedious at best! (Also, I am assuming
the scanner technology you are using also associates the name with the
score? Data (grades/score) management for upwards of 10 or more RATs X 48
students, plus 10 X 8 Team RATs a semester is a nightmare!
Thank you for any help you can provide in this matter.
Gary D. Lynne, Professor
Department of Agricultural Economics and
School of Natural Resources
103B Filley
University of Nebraska-Lincoln
Lincoln, NE 68583-0922
Website: http://agecon.unl.edu/lynne
Phone: 1-402-472-8281
"We are always only one failed generational transfer of knowledge away from
darkest ignorance" (Herman Daly)
----- Forwarded by Gary D Lynne/AgEcon/IANR/UNEBR on 04/11/2008 07:24 AM
-----
Scott Zimmerman
<scottzimmerman@M
ISSOURISTATE.EDU> To
Sent by: Team [log in to unmask]
Learning cc
Discussion List
<TEAMLEARNING-L@L Subject
ISTS.OU.EDU> Re: IF-AT use
04/11/2008 06:58
AM
Please respond to
Scott Zimmerman
<scottzimmerman@M
ISSOURISTATE.EDU>
Christine,
The two RATs are exactly the same. Ideally, we use a scantron for the
individual and the IF-AT for the team. The scantron allows us to correct
the individual RAT during the team RAT. Since our scanner is no longer
functioning, we have been correcting the IRATs by hand.
Scott
On 4/10/08 11:42 PM, "Christine Kuramoto" <[log in to unmask]>
wrote:
> Hi again,
> It looks to me as if the tests are the same, but if you use the IF-AT
> forms for the individual tests, they'll already know the answers before
> the group test so . . . Is it best to only use the IF-AT for the group
test?
> Christine
--
Scott D. Zimmerman, PhD
Biomedical Sciences Department
Missouri State University
Springfield, MO 65897
(417) 836-6123
Fax (417) 836-5588