We have done those options (wireless access in the room, plus school computer per group, permit web access, permit paper and electronic submissions), plus: We have them add a statement that they verify that the submission was done by the group (an honor code issue). And we give them till 5pm the next day - a bit longer to submit; although 99% are submitted that day due to the need to move on to the next topic. They generally work on it after the session while it is fresh in their minds. On a similar note - a questions about appeals and regular exams. We have found the value of the IRA-GRA process so powerful that just about anytime they have an exam we let the groups go through the questions in a GRA format (not for points, but for learning). This leads to exam question appeals too. It helps us understand which questions were confusing and ambiguous, but not sure about giving extra points after the exam based on the appeals. Has anyone tried that? How do you score them? Sandy *************************************** Sandy COOK, PhD | Associate Dean, Curriculum Development | Duke-NUS Graduate Medical School Singapore | W: (65) 6516 8722| F: (65) 6227 2698 | -----Original Message----- From: Team Learning Discussion List [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Larry Michaelsen Sent: Thursday, October 04, 2007 5:04 AM To: [log in to unmask] Subject: Re: RAP Appeals I think I'd try to use technology in some way. Possibilities: 1) If they have access to the web in class (wireless?) let them look up whatever they want. 2) If each of the teams can get access to at least 1 laptop (I've see a situation in which laptop access was one of the team selection criteria so that each team would have laptop access), Create a CD of the required readings. Either way, I'd have them submit the appeal via e-mail. Larry -- Larry K. Michaelsen Professor of Management University of Central Missouri Dockery 400G Warrensburg, MO 64093 [log in to unmask] <---PLEASE NOTE NEW E-MAIL ADDRESS !!! 660/543-4124 voice 660/543-8465 fax >>> "Sibley, Jim" <[log in to unmask]> 10/03/07 3:28 PM >>> Hi Seeking advice I am doing a sustainability course TBL. There is some inclass unhappiness with the Appeal process...since it favours teams that have a hardcopy of the readings The issue is that most of the students do the readings on the web and don't print out hard copy....therefore it is difficult for them to appeal ambiguity in readings...since they don't have a hard copy A few possible solutions I have considered 1. Allow online submission of Appeal by days end....trouble is that I can't ensure that it comes from a teams and not an individual 2. Allow paper submission by days end......could be signed by all members?....could have same issue of individual vs. team 3. Print one hardcopy for each team (not desirable in a Sustainability course) Any other ideas.....advice welcomed _________________________________________________ Jim Sibley Manager Centre for Instructional Support Faculty of Applied Science University of British Columbia 2208- 6250 Applied Science Lane Vancouver, BC Canada V6T 1Z4 Phone 604.822.9241 Fax 604.822.7006 Email: [log in to unmask] Web: www.learning.apsc.ubc.ca <http://www.learning.apsc.ubc.ca/> Blog: Adventures in Instructional Support: http://ipeer.apsc.ubc.ca/wordpress/ e- Portfolio: http://ipeer.apsc.ubc.ca/wiki/index.php/Jim_Sibley_Portfolio ________________________________________________ (c) Copyright 2007, Jim Sibley, All rights reserved The information contained in this e- mail message and any attachments (collectively "message") is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the recipient (or recipients) named above. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you have received this message in error and that any review, use, distribution, or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately by e- mail, and delete the original message. ___________________________________________________