Hi Carl!
 
We don't use the IF-AT forms for the individual RAT, just a normal answer form that they turn in, but get no feedback upon.  That way, the discussion is still "charged" enough with uncertainty for the group RAT (using the IF-ATs) to be energetic and important to the group development.
 
I would love to keep in touch with you to hear how things go.  To my knowledge there is little to no implementation of TBL in the K-12 setting, and as an educational psychologist, differences between "what works" in each setting are of great interest to me!
 
 
-M
 
----- Original Message -----
From: [log in to unmask] href="mailto:[log in to unmask]">Martikean, Carl
To: [log in to unmask] href="mailto:[log in to unmask]">[log in to unmask]
Sent: Saturday, January 21, 2006 8:11 AM
Subject: Using IF-AT forms

I am a high school physics-Chemistry teacher at a mathematics and science academy in Forest Park, Illinois.  I am converting my classes to the TBL model and have come across a concern about the Epstein Education IF-AT answer sheets.
 
Specifically, how would the group RAT work if the form also has been used for the individual RAT?  I love the idea of the immediate feedback and the fact that the student gets several opportunities for reassess his logic.  However, if the students keep track of their individual answers and us them as a reminder for the group RAT, then each group will (would) always get perfect scores simply by comparing and selecting the correct answer.  So, I guess that the question is how to get a discussion going as to why the incorrect choices were made in the first place.  This is not a problem with the scantron forms but then the immediate feedback is also delayed.
 
Any ideas would be greatly appreciated.
 
Carl E. Martikean
PMSA Science