TEAMLEARNING-L Archives

Team-Based Learning

TEAMLEARNING-L@LISTS.UBC.CA

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Larry Michaelsen <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Larry Michaelsen <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 21 Feb 2005 14:54:01 -0600
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (40 lines)
I've always allowed the appeal to resore full credit on the
question--irrespective of the number of scratches (on both the team and
individual tests).  Thus, an appeal of a four-scratch answer would add
more points to the team score than a two-scratch answer and, because I
always give students the option of "splitting" their individual answers
(TBL book, p224), the appeal may end up adding different amounts of
additional credit on the individual test.

Larry


Larry K. Michaelsen
Professor of Management
Dockery 400G
Central Missouri State University
Warrensburg, MO 64093
O: 660 543-4124
F: 660 543-8465

>>> Michael Sweet <[log in to unmask]> - 2/21/05 10:00 AM >>>
Hey Everyone,

I am wondering what strategies folks use to award points for appeals if
teams use the IF-AT scratch off forms.

If a group successfully appeals a question, but it took them two, three
or even four scratches to find the right answer, what kind of credit do
you award the appeal?

I know some instructors use the honor system:  Students have to state
"We scratched off 'A' first."

And some instructors might not care:  "as long as they are driven to
engage the material in support of *any* of the options, they are
learning."

Are there other opinions or systems in use out there?

-Michael

ATOM RSS1 RSS2