Hi Ron
The switch in thinking is hard
But once you get it...it really is easier for the next problems
Jim Sibley
Sorry for brief message -sent from my iPad
On 2012-05-14, at 4:48 PM, "Carson, Ron" <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> Thanks Larry. I must say, coming up with decent scenarios is proving very difficult. I'll continue working on this scenario.
>
> Ron
> ________________________________________
> From: Larry Michaelsen [[log in to unmask]]
> Sent: Monday, May 14, 2012 6:47 PM
> To: Carson, Ron
> Cc: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: Good Examplem of Applilcation Exercise?
>
> Ron,
>
> Two points:
> 1) Even if you have a Simultaneous report, I think you are missing two of the four S's. Your "setting" is so general that asking for a "best" theory isn't really a specific choice. As a result, I'm not at all sure that students would view your question as a Significant problem. There are a variety of ways that you could modify the question so that it was both Significant and Specific. The starting spot would be to give a much richer scenario (i.e.,, lots of detail about the patient). Then you could ask something like, "Which theory would most clearly support (or recommend against) the idea of _____ (fill in the blank with a plausible next step in treating the patient. Another possibility would be to name a plausible next treatment step and ask something like, "Which theory would predict that the outcome would be _____ (and specify some plausible outcome). Another possibility would be to ask, "Based on _____ (name a specific theory), what would be the most critical component o
> f any tr
> 2) You DO need to give all of the groups the Same problem (that's one of the 4 S's). If students are working with different scenarios, they will have neither motivation or information to challenge other groups decisions.
>
> Larry
>
> On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 2:05 PM, Carson, Ron <[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>> wrote:
> I am wrong to think the scenarios should be the same for all groups?
>
> From: Levine, Ruth [mailto:[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>]
> Sent: Monday, May 14, 2012 2:58 PM
> To: Carson, Ron
> Subject: RE: Good Examplem of Applilcation Exercise?
>
> Hi Ron:
> I would suggest instead giving everyone the same patient scenario and asking them to come up with the BEST life care setting (and they must have a SINGLE BEST theory to support it)
> Ruth Levine
> UTMB-Galveston
>
> From: Team-Based Learning [mailto:[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>] On Behalf Of Carson, Ron
> Sent: Monday, May 14, 2012 1:50 PM
> To: [log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>
> Subject: Good Examplem of Applilcation Exercise?
>
> Is this a good example of an application exercise scenario:
>
> “You and your "team" are designing a life care setting for older adults. You must select one aging theory and explain why this best supports your setting.”
>
> Thanks
>
> --
> Ron Carson MHS, OT
> Assistant Professor
> Occupational Therapy Department
> Florida Hospital College of Health Sciences
> 671 Winyah Drive
> Orlando, FL 32803
> 407.303.9182<tel:407.303.9182>
> [cid:image001.gif@01CD31E3.0A9B0080]
>
>
>
>
> --
> *******************************
> Larry K. Michaelsen, Professor of Management
> Dockery 400G, University of Central Missouri
> Warrensburg, MO 64093
> 660/429-9873 voice/cell phone, 660/543-8465 fax
> For info on:
> Team-Based Learning (TBL) <www.teambasedlearning.org<http://www.teambasedlearning.org>>
> Integrative Business Experience (IBE) <http://faculty.ucmo.edu/ibe/home.html>
> *******************************
> plausible
|
