TEAMLEARNING-L Archives

Team-Based Learning

TEAMLEARNING-L@LISTS.UBC.CA

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Sibley, James Edward" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Sibley, James Edward
Date:
Tue, 18 Sep 2012 16:42:08 +0000
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (136 lines)
Here is a finishing complete sentence :-)

Maybe asking team to hypothesize
about the results if we   CHANGED a parameter


-- 
Jim Sibley 
Director 
Centre for Instructional Support
Faculty of Applied Science
University of British Columbia
2205-6250 Applied Science Lane
Vancouver, BC Canada
V6T 1Z4 

Phone 604.822.9241 
Fax 604.822.7006 

Email: [log in to unmask]
<applewebdata:[log in to unmask]>

Check out http:// <http://cis.apsc.ubc.ca/>www.teambasedlearning.org


© Copyright 2012, Jim Sibley, All rights reserved The information
contained in this e-mail message and any attachments (collectively
"message") is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the
recipient (or recipients) named above. If the reader of this message is
not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you have received
this message in error and that any review, use, distribution, or copying
of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this in
error, please notify the sender immediately by e-mail, and delete the
meesage.




On 12-09-18 9:36 AM, "Sibley, James Edward" <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

>Hi
>
>Could you do a synthesis activity....where teams of 2-3 students do
>experiment....get results
>
>Then the TBL activity might be 2-3 teams discussing and combining their
>results to come up with a team answer? Maybe asking team to hypothesize
>about the results if we   a a parameter
>
>JIm
>-- 
>Jim Sibley 
>Director 
>Centre for Instructional Support
>Faculty of Applied Science
>University of British Columbia
>2205-6250 Applied Science Lane
>Vancouver, BC Canada
>V6T 1Z4 
>
>Phone 604.822.9241
>Fax 604.822.7006 
>
>Email: [log in to unmask]
><applewebdata:[log in to unmask]>
>
>Check out http:// <http://cis.apsc.ubc.ca/>www.teambasedlearning.org
>
>
>© Copyright 2012, Jim Sibley, All rights reserved The information
>contained in this e-mail message and any attachments (collectively
>"message") is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the
>recipient (or recipients) named above. If the reader of this message is
>not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you have received
>this message in error and that any review, use, distribution, or copying
>of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this in
>error, please notify the sender immediately by e-mail, and delete the
>meesage.
>
>
>
>
>On 12-09-17 9:35 AM, "J.Aires de Sousa" <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
>>Dear TBLers
>>
>>We are implementing TBL in various Chemistry undergraduate courses. A
>>key issue here is the integration of lab works. We understand lab
>>sessions can be great application activities. At the same time, the
>>process urges to re-frame the real goal of lab sessions (demonstration
>>of "natural laws", learning activities, training of lab skills,...?).
>>And the organization of sessions must be completely reshaped.
>>
>>In one case, we adapted our traditional lab works to TBL applications,
>>using essentially the same material and reagents. For example, one
>>session was about acid-basis titrations of solutions. Before, the
>>students used to follow a recipe. Now, they don't know the concentration
>>of one solution, and teams have to find it using the titrations. The
>>evaluation of the team is based on the result -- how close it is to the
>>real concentration.
>>
>>A problem we face on reshaping lab sessions as TBL applications is about
>>creating lab activities for teams of 6-8 students. Students
>>traditionally work in groups of 2-3, because no more than that can
>>perform the same task simultaneously! To overcome it, we could divide
>>tasks by team members, but that would loose the "team driving force" of
>>TBL... At the same time we want that all students are trained on all
>>techniques... In the above-mentioned case, each team was divided in two:
>>each sub-team had to validate the results of the other, and the whole
>>team had to arrive at a final team answer for the concentration.
>>
>>In some courses (e.g., organic synthesis) we very much emphasize the
>>training of individual lab skills. A proposal for TBLing lab sessions is
>>that each student (or pair of students) is assigned the task of
>>performing the synthesis of the same product, and teams have to deliver
>>the maximum possible amount of bulk product (resulting from the
>>individual contributions). The team will be evaluated on the basis of
>>the amount and purity of the product they deliver. In this way, team
>>members would be encouraged to cooperate to achieve the maximum possible
>>yield and purity. During the process, and at the end, the whole team
>>would have to make decisions about which contributed products are
>>excluded if their purity is not good enough.
>>
>>I'd be grateful if you could comment on these issues, come up with new
>>ideas for TBLing lab sessions, and send me examples of implementing lab
>>works as TBL activities.
>>
>>Joao
>>
>>-- 
>>Joao Aires de Sousa
>>Departamento de Quimica, Faculdade de Ciencias e Tecnologia,
>>Universidade Nova de Lisboa, 2829-516 Caparica, Portugal
>>Tel: (+351) 21 2948300 x10907   Fax: (+351) 21 2948550
>>Email: [log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2